"“Oh he doesn’t know what the 23-gigabyte file is, therefore he didn’t prove anything.” That’s what my biggest fear was."
Exactly what I said. *HE* doesn't know what that data is, therefore he cannot prove what it is.
Therefore, it could be election data without him knowing how to decode it.
Therefore, he has not proven his claim that it is not election data.
Why is this hard to get? He's trying to get 5 million out of Lindell, and the man has already been cheated by someone, you are saying it is Dennis Montgomery, but a decent man would just tell Lindell he's been conned, and not try to claim the money.
His "proof" is inconclusive, therefore it is not proof.
He should not get the money.
That’s a quote from the guy who proved the information was false about Mike Lindell.
IOWs, Lindell had no idea what the data was, and Lindell didn’t prove anything which was the biggest fear of the person who proved it false.
At the very least it proves Lindell was stupid and careless about offering up a 5 million dollar challenge when he had no idea what he was showing and obviously would have no idea if the data was fraudulent.
As I’ve said the guy at the center of this mess is Dennis Montgomery, click on the links I’ve provided in this thread, Montgomery has a history of fraud going back to just after 9/11.