Exactly how did the engineer prove it? Curious.
He didn't. That's why he shouldn't get the money.
He just declared that in his professional opinion the data is gibberish.
Which would be exactly the same result he would have if it was encrypted packet data that he didn't understand.
Packet captures are just raw data that is unreadable by humans unless it’s run thru packet capture software that can decipher it.
This engineer ran the data thru numerous tools that do this and none of them showed anything pertaining to election fraud.
That’s his claim and two courts have agreed.
Lindell could put this all to bed by releasing the data to the public along with how it was decoded and what it shows, he has up to this point refused to do so.