Packet captures are just raw data that is unreadable by humans unless it’s run thru packet capture software that can decipher it.
This engineer ran the data thru numerous tools that do this and none of them showed anything pertaining to election fraud.
That’s his claim and two courts have agreed.
Lindell could put this all to bed by releasing the data to the public along with how it was decoded and what it shows, he has up to this point refused to do so.
Do *YOU* know how to do computer programing and create packets to be sent through networks?
*I* do. If I design a packet that is not recognizable by your "tools", then what does that mean? It means your tools can't recognize my specially designed packets, which is what I have already told you several times.
A lot of companies create proprietary software that they won't let anyone look at, and these voting machine companies very likely do exactly that. Without knowing how the software intends to use the packets, you can't tell what those packets do.
That’s his claim and two courts have agreed.
And what do these *IGNORANT* court people know about it?
Why do so many people have respect for courts, when there is a massive body of legal history showing the courts to be often incompetent and often just making up law as they go along?