Here’s a link to the guy who proved Lindell’s data was bogus, he’s 50-year veteran of the computer industry who voted for Trump.
Here’s another article that goes into detail of Dennis Montgomery who sold the information to Lindell and how Lindell has failed to actually show the data he says he has.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-election-montgomery/
"“Oh he doesn’t know what the 23-gigabyte file is, therefore he didn’t prove anything.” That’s what my biggest fear was."
Exactly what I said. *HE* doesn't know what that data is, therefore he cannot prove what it is.
Therefore, it could be election data without him knowing how to decode it.
Therefore, he has not proven his claim that it is not election data.
Why is this hard to get? He's trying to get 5 million out of Lindell, and the man has already been cheated by someone, you are saying it is Dennis Montgomery, but a decent man would just tell Lindell he's been conned, and not try to claim the money.
His "proof" is inconclusive, therefore it is not proof.
He should not get the money.