Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeneralisimoFranciscoFranco

To be fair, it is a “warship “, but not a very large one with a crew of 32-80. Perhaps large patrol boat is more appropriate, but it also appears it needs escorts to defend itself.

Besides redefining warfare with drones, this war seems to be redefining winning as well.


23 posted on 03/06/2024 3:43:06 AM PST by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: blitz128; GeneralisimoFranciscoFranco
GeneralisimoFranciscoFranco: "Russia can build a war ship for $65 mm?
We should get them to build some for us."

blitz128: "To be fair, it is a “warship “, but not a very large one with a crew of 32-80.
Perhaps large patrol boat is more appropriate, but it also appears it needs escorts to defend itself."

Curiously, at 1,700 tons, Sergey Kotov was roughly the size of an older US WWII destroyer "tin can" like the Farragut class.
As such, it was considerably larger than the 330 ton old US Navy Cyclone class patrol boats, the last of which was decommissioned in 2023.

Sergey Kotov is less than half the size of US Littoral Combat Ships (LCS), which we now consider pretty much useless.

So to find a rough US equivalent, you have to look at the US Coast Guard Famous-class cutters, of which we have 13 in service.

I can't find a unit cost of construction for the Famous-class, but would bet money they cost us a lot more than the $65 million price tag on Russia's ex-Sergey Kotov.

79 posted on 03/07/2024 4:27:09 AM PST by BroJoeK (future DDG 134 -- we remember)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson