There’s video/stills of another Abrams that got hit by a Russian Lancer drone. Per Abrams experts, it looks like the crew was probably fine, but the tank was a loss - might have been fixable but it would not have been economically sensible. The ammo in the bustle was cooking off and had blown out the panels designed for the purpose, and the powerpack was fully involved in fire.
That’s two, possibly three Abrams that have been lost for zero enemy kills. Not good; Ukranian T-series tanks have been doing better.
There are 31 Abrams M1A... in Ukraine.
In a video produced about 2 days after Ukraine lost Avdiivka, an Abrams advanced from a location northwest from there, and the tank headed east toward Russian positions, about 1 hour after sunset, it seemed.
That Abrams hit 5 Russian positions and then retreated to the west.
IIRC, Russia did capture one of the Abrams Breachers.
The Bradley seems to be a success, except that there were maintenance problems in colder weather.
“ That’s two, possibly three Abrams that have been lost for zero enemy kills. Not good; Ukranian T-series tanks have been doing better.”
****************************************************************
From what I’ve read the Russians offer substantial financial rewards for Abrams kills or captures. So I’m sure the Russian combatants are very hot-to-trot to seek and target Abrams tanks.
Why do you assume any particular number of enemy kills, including “zero”?