Posted on 03/03/2024 1:18:12 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
They provided ATM location data.
I see that they had arguments on Feb. 8. From an article on today’s unsigned unanimous ruling:
“During Feb. 8 oral arguments, the majority of the justices had signaled openness to reversing a December decision by the Colorado Supreme Court to kick Trump off the primary ballot.”
Think the Left has for the most part surrendered least for now but they will be back..
That’s actually not a strong defense. The president is not the government or even the head of the government , he is the head of one third of the government. If the president decided to disband Congress and the judiciary by force, that would certainly qualify as an insurrection. So yes, the president could be guilty of insurrection. That’s not the case here, but to try to say the president could not be guilty of insurrection against his own government is a losing argument.
“Think the Left has for the most part surrendered least for now.. “
I wouldn’t count on that.
I was just reading a very disturbing piece on the National Pulse.
Turns out for three years the Left has been working on a back-up plan if Trump wins and they can’t steal it. It is very plausible and very scary:
Step 1) Import 10 million illegals and distribute them strategically to Democrat strongholds in order to affect the census.
Step 2) Use the census data and partisan judges redistrict (gerrymander) to pick up congressional seats for 2024 - winning back a house majority.
Step 3) In the height of all irony, Democrats will refuse to certify a Trump victory on January 6, 2025.
Read more here:
The name of the article is Democrats Say They Won’t Certify Trump Win in Congress.
I had heard they plan on Democrats refusing to certify a Trump victory on January 6, 2025.
Kudos friends! Those who predicted a 9-0 ruling were right on the money…excuse me while I go eat my delicious 🐦⬛ crow!
Cant. At least using 14th amendment. Stated in this ruling Congress can NOT use it if Trump wins in November.
Thank God it was 9-0. If even one went against the ruling they would say that one was right and others wrong. Would have been a Constitutional Crisis. Actually I think this was one.
Never underestimate the power of a corrupt Congress..
BTTT!
I thought I had read that the USSC had already ruled on this & that Mr. Trump would definitely be on the ballots. Am I reading news ahead of time here or what??? I have a friend who doesn’t like Biden but would definitely NOT vote for Trump. Thinks he is completely unsuitable as a president or maybe even as a person. The arguments for these views were explained & I tried to make it plain that, while he was possibly not a perfect person, he still did a good job of running the country when he had served previously & that Biden was an utter disaster in every sense of the word. Guess we ended up agreeing to disagree on this one. I will vote on election day & this other person will probably not vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.