All I know is Ramaswamy is 1000 times richer, 500 times smarter and can speak 100 times better than you ever will.
Did I say something to threaten the potential pick of Ramaswamy in your mind by referring to his occasional verbal forays into "loose cannon" territory?
If you had been on this site for a longer period of time, you might have noticed that many of us occasionally refer to President Trump as a "loose cannon". It isn't always negative, either. Many of us desire a loose cannon in government. Also, any candidate who I would even consider supporting walks as close to the truth without having to engage in focus groups, campaign managers, or scriptwriters. Being an occasional "loose cannon" with respect to the campaign team is the price that is paid.
If you wish to engage in civil discourse, you might say something along the lines of:
"rlmorel, I don't think Vivek Ramaswamy is a loose cannon. Why do you characterize him is such a way. I see that as a negative, and I disagree. Can you expand on this?"
And I might respond.
Then we might both get something out of the exchange, and both be better off for it.