Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Engoron drew weird ⁢conclusions that were based on evidence that was undisputed.
<><>There were ⁤no victims of Trump’s alleged fraud,
<><>and no losses resulted from it
<><>The lenders who made the loans performed their ⁢own valuations,
<><>they were fully paid back, and made significant‌ profits.‌
<><>They‌ were satisfied with Trump and wanted to continue ​doing business with him.

In a sane world, that would have been the end of it. ⁢But Democrat New Yorker, Engoron, engaged in legal gymnastics ....w/ a rarely used form⁣ of “equitable”​ relief called “disgorgement” ⁢to prevent Trump from keeping what Engeron alleged are “ill-gotten gains.”

Engoron overvalued ‌Trump’s gains to an absurd extent, surpassing anything Trump was accused of.
<><>Engoron ordered ‍Trump to disgorge $168 million
<><>so-called interest payment “savings” that he supposedly gained from certain loans.
<><>Engoron suggested Trump preyed on lenders
<><>that Trump got “lower interest rates‍” using recourse loans compared to non-recourse ⁣loans.

Recourse loans provide more security for lenders ⁣and therefore have lower‍ interest rates compared to non-recourse loans.


Engoron’s calculation of ⁤disgorgement was based on a⁣ false comparison between the two types of⁣ loans,⁢ resulting in a grossly overvalued amount.

Engoron could have used a proper ‍economic analysis to‍ calculate Trump’s alleged gains accurately. ⁢However,⁤ doing so would have resulted in zero “ill-gotten ‌gains”‌ for Trump.

The interest rates Trump obtained were based on⁢ the ​lenders’ own valuations, not Trump’s.‌ Therefore, Engoron’s ​$168 million disgorgement calculation was falsely overvalued by the​ full amount.


7 posted on 02/25/2024 5:04:20 AM PST by Liz (Political correctness is tyranny with manners. Charlton Heston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Liz

I paid over asking price to make sure I got the property. Now what...will I be sued by those who offered lower because my white privilege allowed me to go higher? Just how many people did I defraud? I was happy with the deal and so was the bank. The property has increased significantly in value in the short time I owned it. Will the previous owner now sue because in retrospect they should have held out for a higher offer?


11 posted on 02/25/2024 5:17:48 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson