Its this type of crap, albeit mostly in the residential market, rocked the financial world in 07-08-09. We were incensed the big money people and banks were doing such things. Now we’re fine with it.
Want a towel for the wind spatter, Democrat boy?
2. The facts of this case demonstrate the absurdity of having the government override or ignore the sound business practices of commercial lenders. The bank dude on the witness stand described how his bank cut Trump's personal net worth estimate in half after they reviewed all the documentation, and Trump still had something like ten times more than the minimum net worth he would have needed to qualify for the loan in question.
3. This is going to have impacts far beyond banking and real estate. Hell -- I myself was involved in two different ends of a commercial transaction in New York over the course of a decade in the early 2000s (buying and selling a business) ... and I probably could have been subject to civil complaints identical to the Trump case for BOTH transactions under this stupid law -- even though nobody involved in any part of either transaction would believe you if you told them the transactions were "fraudulent" by any measure.
Rot in hell scumbag. You deserve the same fate as this judge.
The law(s) you are referring to have never ever been used this way. You are a joke. A supporter of political persecution.