[joesbucks]

You wrote she said: I think that this is really an extraordinary unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about because they’re very different than Donald Trump and his behavior.

She did caveat with law abiding and rule following businesses. You’re saying they’re not?

My guess. A lot of accounting departments have been working overtime dotting i’s and crossing t’s to assure documents didn’t contain those types of misrepresentations. And corporate attorney phones were red hot with questions about exposure/risk.

[Alberta's Child]

I think you’re pissing in the wind there. There’s no defense against this type of prosecution except to assume — for disclosure purposes — an underlying asset valuation of $0 for everything on your books.

The most damaging aspect of this case is that every business owner in New York has been put on notice that the State of New York considers itself a party to every financial transaction in the state -- and one that will aggressively pursue civil cases as an "injured" party even if no harm can be shown.

[kiryandil]

I'm saying she said what she was doing.

Because you're a Democrat apologist, you're pretending not to understand what she said.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

She did caveat with law abiding and rule following businesses.

"Law abiding" as interpreted by a NY judge.

[Chgogal]

You would have followed Hitler into hell.