Posted on 02/16/2024 11:11:57 AM PST by Red Badger
KEY POINTS
New York Attorney General Letitia James accused former President Donald Trump, his company and others of fraudulently inflating Trump’s assets to boost his net worth and get financial perks.
Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron had found Trump and his co-defendants liable for fraud before the case went to trial.
Trump is the clear front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, setting up a likely rematch with President Joe Biden.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A judge could deliver a hammer blow to Donald Trump and his company when he issues a decision in the New York civil trial accusing the former president of years of business fraud.
The ruling from Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron is expected to be announced Friday afternoon. Engoron will deliver the ruling, as the trial was held without a jury.
The explosive trial stemmed from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit accusing Trump, his two adult sons, his company and top executives of fraudulently inflating Trump’s assets to boost his stated net worth and obtain various financial perks.
Friday’s decision would be the latest court-ordered punishment imposed on Trump, who is running for president while dealing with numerous criminal and civil lawsuits. Last month, a jury in a separate civil case in New York federal court ordered Trump to pay $83.3 million for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll when he responded to her claim that he had raped her in the mid-1990s.
Trump is the clear front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, setting up a likely rematch with President Joe Biden, who beat him in 2020.
Trump has frequently raged against his many legal battles as “witch hunts,” claiming they are part of a Biden administration-backed conspiracy to tank his political ambitions.
He vociferously denies all wrongdoing in the New York fraud case, blaring his claims of total innocence on social media, at the courthouse and even on the witness stand.
Trump claimed to be worth far more than what was reported on his financial statements, while asserting that a disclaimer on the records protected him from liability for any inaccuracies.
But Trump and the other defendants were found liable for fraud by Engoron before the trial even began.
In a bombshell pre-trial ruling, Engoron granted summary judgment on James’ main cause of action — that the defendants committed fraud in violation of New York law.
Engoron found that Trump’s statements of financial condition between 2014 and 2021 overvalued his assets between $812 million and $2.2 billion.
The ruling razed Trump’s defense claims, accusing him and his co-defendants of trying to convince the court to “not believe its own eyes.”
Engoron also ordered the cancellation of the defendants’ business certificates and the appointment of an independent receiver to manage the dissolution of Trump’s corporate entities. Some experts have described the ruling as a “death penalty” for the Trump Organization.
But that order was put on hold during the trial, which was conducted to determine the amount to be paid in penalties and resolve other claims of wrongdoing from James’ lawsuit.
The trial also doubled as a soapbox for Trump to air his grievances about his perceived political foes — including those sitting feet away from him in court.
On the witness stand, Trump railed against Engoron and James while defending the values that were reported on his statements of financial condition. Trump also tore into another key witness, his former fixer and personal lawyer Michael Cohen, who testified that Trump had directed him to falsely manipulate his net worth.
Trump’s venting brought consequences: On the second day of the trial, Engoron imposed a narrow gag order after Trump repeatedly targeted the judge’s principal law clerk, Allison Greenfield, who sat in court.
Trump violated the gag order twice within four weeks, catching fines totaling $15,000.
This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.
Right before the weekend, so a guilty verdict it is~
The left is trying to start a CIVIL WAR in America….Nothing is surprising these day……..
No prejudice in this report.
Timed to take the heat off Fani’s pitiful testimony???
Trump has already been found guilty by this POS Judge months ago.
Trump is guilty for getting a loan and then PAYING IT BACK IN FULL.
Trump should have done what all these Student Load Leeches did. Take huge loans for something worthless, spend 10-20-30 years trying to pay it back AND FAILING, then get all debts forgiven just because they are deadbeat Democrats!!!!!!
Hammer blow? Absurd, it will get appealed in a New York second. Just another DNC publicity stunt!
HOW quickly can TRUMP get this all-—ALL of these cases in front of the USSC?
I DO NOT understand how a judge can make a ruling BEFORE a trial——
Yes, they are.
This is Abomination.
Letitia James is another Fani Willis.
The Attack of the Lardass Ghettopotamuses!
WHEN “Judge” Imamoron (not IF) throws the book at Trump, you can bet the Democrats and their media will have an absolute Field Day with this. The whole thing is so corrupt and unjust.
I bet I can predict the “verdict”
meh.
I’m no lawyer so I don’t know, but can’t Trump appeal this crap to an unbias court? Same with the fake sexual assault which really ticked me off. Zero evidence, zero witnesses he ever touched her and HE is liable for defaming her?? WHAT?
An unbiased court?
In New York?.......................
And NYC can forget about any developers doing business in that city again. Any that do are out of their mind. Let that whole puke hole posing as a city go to hell now, the morons living there voted 89% democrat last November, so F them and I grew up there BTW. It sickens me how far that city has fallen.
If we were paying attention long ago, back in '93, UPENN student Eden Jacobowitz supposedly helped us Johnny-come-latelies learn the central elements of Communistic speech police when he experienced his First-Amendment-stifling, career-crippling backlash to the non-crime of using his "water buffalo" epithet!
Does one need to build a taller Tower of Babel by extrapolating evermore picturesque terms? Though we have free speech, can we not be satisfied with the distance Mr. Jacobowitz so long ago "carried the ball," perhaps as an homage?"
But I suppose some would not be sated until the preferred water buffalo pronouns should be used.
I honestly don’t know what has happened to this once great country.. to want to destroy this man take his livelihood all for being a great president
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.