Posted on 02/16/2024 5:40:14 AM PST by CFW
And did sexually assault a client.
Why did he leave his money in the firm’s escrow account when he left the firm?
Getting interesting
*** allegations ****
Now Atty Steve Sadow (sp) questioning about -
***misconduct allegations*** raised by Wade I believe...
“Exactly. Normal decent people live that way. Criminals, however, avoid paper trails.”
Agreed. I may have some cash in my house, but I could easily show where a paycheck was deposited and I withdrew $200 the following day if that evidence was needed for Court.
allegations by an employee of their firm the state (atty cross) is now saying....
WOW, Willis’s defense had NO good reason to attack Bradley. His testimony was NOT as detrimental as it could have been. Willis’s defense team STUPIDLY opened a can of worms regarding privilege. Willis’s team wanted Bradley to have privilege in matters favorable to them but they encouraged him not to claim privilege in matters favorable to them.
This case is crazy
“Can anybody tell me how much longer this testimony will go on before this Judge makes a decision?”
The hearing may be concluded today. However, I do not expect a quick decision (certainly not in the next few days). He will probably issue his ruling within the next couple of weeks. Normally, in a case of this magnitude I would think any order would cite case law and court opinions as to the reasoning for the Court’s decision. It will take time for that Order to be drafted.
He turned down the offer because, as he put it, he had to feed his law firm (i.e., the offer wasn't attractive financially). If Barnes had been offered $650,000, that would have fed the lawyers in his firm and then some.
IOW, I don't think Barnes (a very experienced and influential lawyer) was offered what Wade got, making the point that Wade was given preferential treatment because he was Fani's paramour and because he might return some of that sum to Fani (which he did).
When there on so many lies by so many witnesses, it gets complicated.
Apparently, there IS one more witness, so the hearing will not be concluded today. Plus, the judge will speak to Mr. Bradley in chambers and determine which information is privileged before he is allowed to testify further.
It will continue on.....
We all know how this will turn out.
Bar Association interfering with an investigation...witness tampering.
When he took the stand, Bradley stated they told him under no circumstances to testify on specific topics.
Atty austin Dabney up now - state is questioning. He worked for wade and bradleys firm at one point.
“Why did he leave his money in the firm’s escrow account when he left the firm?”
That was weird. Especially since it was in response to the question, “Did you pay anybody?”
Another attorney. I didn’t catch his/her preferred pronouns.
State (atty cross) now trying to damage bradleys credibility and impeach bradleys testimony. Dabney may have seen a sexual assault at a club involving bradely and an employee.
Another rabbit hole.....
He said the BAR ASSOCIATION told him that?
Attorney Dabne self-identifies as a poodle.
“Another attorney. I didn’t catch his/her preferred pronouns.”
LOL!
I amend my statement about when we can expect a decision. There are still subpoenas pending for phone and flight records. It may be a while before we get a decision from the judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.