Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/13/2024 8:10:07 AM PST by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: justlittleoleme; Regulator

Laura Loomer is wrong about this Bill. Here is a link to the text: https://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/113/Bill/SB2838.pdf.

From the proposed legislation:

(3) President and vice president. In accordance with and in
furtherance of the requirements under the United States Constitution, Article II,
each candidate must provide authentic, documented proof of meeting the
requirements of these offices before the person can be placed on a ballot within
this state, including proof of the following:
(A) The person is of the requisite age;
(B) The person is a natural born citizen of the United States; and
(C) The person has been a lawful resident of the United States for
the requisite period.

(4) Presidential electors...
(B) Effective immediately upon the adoption of this act,
presidential electors for this state are prohibited from casting a vote for
any presidential or vice presidential candidate whose eligibility for office is
in question or doubt at the time of the vote, and until such time as the
candidate has been properly investigated and cleared of any reasonable
doubt.
(C) Candidates or electors who knowingly attempt to secure
these offices by providing false or misleading information in order to
appear on the ballot, must be immediately disqualified from the election,
prohibited from seeking any political office in the future, and investigated
for an act of sedition or subversion against the people of the United
States

* * *

The legislation prohibits and elector from casting a ballot for POTUS or VPOTUS if the candidate fails to provide proof of eligibility under Article II of the United States Constitution — age, natural born citizenship, and residency. It does not reference the Sedition Clause in the 14th Amendment directly or indirectly. The legislation clearly defines natural born citizens and naturalized citizens, dand distinguishes the two types of citizenship with respect to eligibility under Article II.

THE CLEAR PURPOSE OF THE LEGISLATION IS TO KEEP THE LIKES OF HALEY, HARRIS, AND OBAMA OFF THE BALLOT — NOT TRUMP.

Laura Loomer owes a big apology to the so-called RINO who introduced the proposed legislation.


28 posted on 02/13/2024 9:09:52 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

So… guilty until proven innocent?


29 posted on 02/13/2024 9:11:47 AM PST by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme
I live in TN.

The voters are deep red, but the Legislature is infiltrated by RINO traitors.

30 posted on 02/13/2024 9:13:00 AM PST by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme
...it would “BAN Presidential electors from the state of Tennessee from casting a vote for any presidential or vice presidential candidate whose eligibility for office is in question or doubt at the time of the vote

Kamala Harris? Nikki Haley? Vivek Ramaswamy?

37 posted on 02/13/2024 10:04:14 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Nothing says "democracy" like trying to throw your opponent in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Pretty low bar. Question, doubt, reasonable doubt. Not even a conviction of crime.

And these are Republicans.


41 posted on 02/13/2024 10:20:45 AM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

“The bill would go into effect immediately after being signed, and it would “BAN Presidential electors from the state of Tennessee from casting a vote for any presidential or vice presidential candidate whose eligibility for office is in question or doubt”

“question or doubt” by whom???? Anyone.

The propoased language leaves it so open as how such “question or doubt” is either quanitified or qualified. I think any high court, state of federal would agree.


42 posted on 02/13/2024 10:21:58 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

I don’t believe this at all. Our local talk shows would be all over it.

Not a word.


44 posted on 02/13/2024 10:26:24 AM PST by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Better not

Im voting in the morning...

Voting for President trump for the 5th time

Early voting in TN

Wednesday Feb 14 until Friday Feb 27

Mon-Fri 9-6pm Sat 9-4pm

Regular Primary on Super Tuesday, March 5, 2024

Trump 2024

WOO WOO


45 posted on 02/13/2024 10:52:16 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Guilty until proven innocent. Nothing illegal about that.


47 posted on 02/13/2024 11:04:08 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

I always feared that TN conservatism is a myth.


48 posted on 02/13/2024 11:09:21 AM PST by Theodore R. ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme
SCOTUS opened up this Pandora's Box when they affirmed the "faithless Elector" laws. I still say that it is unconstitutional to pass any laws binding the vote of Electors to the Electoral College.

The Framers intended the Electors to that "no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Laws like this usurp the power of Electors by the legislatures that are passing these laws.

Article II Section 1 says:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
It is my belief that the " Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct" only applies to how Electors are selected, but cannot apply to how they vote. If legislatures can pass laws forcing Electors to vote a certain way, then the legislatures become the de facto Electors and Electors become rubber-stamps of the legislatures.

-PJ

52 posted on 02/13/2024 11:55:19 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

““whose eligibility for office is in question or doubt at the time of the vote””

questioned or in doubt by WHOM?


54 posted on 02/13/2024 12:44:38 PM PST by catnipman (A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Our posted contributor writers need to be very careful and clear in what they originally wrote.

One mistake major or sometimes minor ones, can destroy a reputation for accuracy and trustworthiness. We cannot afford to do this.


55 posted on 02/13/2024 2:20:07 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: justlittleoleme

Looks like TN SB2838 has “withdrawn” as current status as of 2/13/24.


61 posted on 02/14/2024 7:09:52 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The Truth is like a lion. You don't need to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson