Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlipWilson

I disagree, the special counsel’s report put a spotlight on Brandon’s senility, and yes he was not charged, but the legal question is if a sitting president can be prosecuted.


3 posted on 02/09/2024 10:57:45 AM PST by DallasBiff (Apology not accepted.la is not the sharpest knife in the drawer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DallasBiff

Quote: “I disagree, the special counsel’s report put a spotlight on Brandon’s senility, and yes he was not charged, but the legal question is if a sitting president can be prosecuted.”

Yes, it did put a spotlight on that. But it also put a spotlight on the fact that his senility was what kept him from being charged with a crime THAT HE COMMITTED.

There is a huge difference between being cleared of any criminal conduct and being found to have committed criminal conduct. BUT EVEN THOUGH Biden committed a crime, not being charged due to his mental capacity. Two for one right there.

As far as charging a sitting President. That is just awesome for Trump given the case in the DC circuit. He may be sitting, but the crimes Biden committed were not done when he was President of anything.

So Trump can be charged with crimes based on actions he took while President. But Biden can’t be charged with crimes he committed wile not President because now he is. And Smith is arguing immunity isn’t absolute? Ok then, Biden hauled out of the White House please, or at least indicted NOW, and tried the second he leaves.


5 posted on 02/09/2024 11:05:06 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson