Quote: “I disagree, the special counsel’s report put a spotlight on Brandon’s senility, and yes he was not charged, but the legal question is if a sitting president can be prosecuted.”
Yes, it did put a spotlight on that. But it also put a spotlight on the fact that his senility was what kept him from being charged with a crime THAT HE COMMITTED.
There is a huge difference between being cleared of any criminal conduct and being found to have committed criminal conduct. BUT EVEN THOUGH Biden committed a crime, not being charged due to his mental capacity. Two for one right there.
As far as charging a sitting President. That is just awesome for Trump given the case in the DC circuit. He may be sitting, but the crimes Biden committed were not done when he was President of anything.
So Trump can be charged with crimes based on actions he took while President. But Biden can’t be charged with crimes he committed wile not President because now he is. And Smith is arguing immunity isn’t absolute? Ok then, Biden hauled out of the White House please, or at least indicted NOW, and tried the second he leaves.
Ken Starr exposed Billy J. Clinton got a bj by a White House intern in the oval office and lied about it, yet the American people shrugged it off, it was just about sex, most said, hey the economy is good, they said. Hillary was humiliated, but she did not care.
Now with a bad economy and Biden's obvious senility, I believe that resonates.
Like former cardinal Theodore McCarrick, he'll be deemed incompetent to stand trial.