You confuse a winning case and tone of voice as a good argument. This case will be studied for decades, and the transcript will show that Trump's attorney Jonathan Mitchell was either unqualified for the task or compromised by outside forces. His brief and his argument needlessly conceded important points critical to his client. Luckily, almost all the justices could see the importance of the issue and did his job for him.
I disagree. He focused on the strongest arguments and didn’t get sidetracked. Very good job.
You're either a DIM-BULB LIBERAL.. or you're doing some HALLUCINOGENIC DRUG!
LOL
I don’t know who you are or what you claim to know……
…but I didn’t confuse anything.