Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2024 5:44:55 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

The racist Ghettopotamus can railroad and push around a former President of the United States but like her butt boyz, Bidenskyyyyy and Newyorkass, she believes she’s above the law. Lock the biatch up.


2 posted on 02/08/2024 5:49:03 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer ( Joe Pedo's America! The Motel 6 to the world. Joe's Border Patrol will keep the light on for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
If you're innocent what's the problem? Isn't that what she would say if SHE subpoenaed someone?

Or is it just racist?

3 posted on 02/08/2024 5:49:36 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

BTTT


4 posted on 02/08/2024 5:49:54 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Well, she can always get a job as a Victoria's Secret™ model if this D.A. thing doesn't work out.
5 posted on 02/08/2024 6:03:51 AM PST by SecondAmendment (The history of the present Federal Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

TAP DANCING as fast as she can


7 posted on 02/08/2024 7:23:57 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

no factual basis that could reasonably justify requiring opposing counsel and other employees to be a witness in the case
———

Wrong. 1) if there were no case against Trump there would be no reason to hire Wade, her boyfriend, as outside counsel. 2). If there is no reason to hire Wade, there is no reason for Willis to use taxpayer funds to pay wade. 3) if there are no payments to Wade, there is no mechanism by which Willis could use those taxpayer funds for her own benefit. There is an appearance of a quid pro quo. Bring a case, hire her boyfriend, and derive direct benefits from those payment.

One could argue that these actions are racketeering among other crimes - bringing a case in order to justify hiring her boyfriend as outside counsel so that her boyfriend could then lavish her with gifts at taxpayer expense. If she didn’t bring the case, she would have received no benefit. Or in other words, the case could have been brought expressly in order that she would personally profit by it.

It’s a question that has to be explored.


10 posted on 02/08/2024 9:28:41 AM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson