Posted on 02/01/2024 10:31:58 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
The video of the act was posted online by the perpetrator and found by conservative news outlets. Naturally, the mainstream press had little interest in the story, and Sen. Ben Cardin, who employed the staffer, was allowed to simply drop the issue. Keep in mind, we are talking about the same mainstream press that spent two weeks obsessing over Rep. Lauren Boebert engaging in some ill-advised heavy petting in a movie theater.
Aidan Maese-Czeropski, the staffer in question, was defiant in the aftermath, claiming he was "being attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda." Yeah, I'm sure that was it. It wasn't him filming himself going at it with another dude in a Capitol hearing room. It was just a "political agenda.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
I get that and completely disagree with the J6 charges too.
Politicians and Academia... Have sex with who you want, where you want and how you want. That’s the rule for them.
Did he do anything different than our legislature does to the voter and consitution, assuming the latter has a rear end....except he videotaped it.
Rome will burn, and this is why. Disinfection is God’s way. He has done it before.
Couldnt he be charged under public nuisance laws?
A public nuisance created in a public place or on public land,
affecting morals, safety, or health, and is considered an offense against the state.
Such activities as operating a house of prostitution is a public nuisance.
Legal ways to be a nuisance?
Courts look broadly to evaluate whether an action by a party constitutes a nuisance, including whether the action unreasonably interferes with the morals, health, safety, and comfort of the affected parties (in this case taxpayers).
he probably could be, but who would do it?
Filing a charge against a public nuisance.
<><>Most public nuisances must be brought by government officials on behalf of the public.
<><>Private citizens can bring a class action to enjoin the nuisance in some cases.
<><>a private individual can bring an action on their own,
<><>but they must suffer a greater or different nuisance than the rest of the public.
see post #27.
nuisances.usalegal.gov
Criminal penalties
snip
A public nuisance is a crime against the order and economy of a state. The following is an example of a state statute explaining places and persons constituting the offense of public nuisance, for which a criminal prosecution can be initiated.
1. Every place:
wherein any fighting between people or animals or birds shall be conducted; or
wherein any intoxicating liquors are kept for unlawful use, sale or distribution;
where vagrants resort;
and
2. Every act unlawfully done and every omission to perform a duty, which act or omission that:
annoy, injure or endanger the safety, health, comfort, or repose of any considerable number of persons;
offend public decency;
unlawfully interfere with, befoul, obstruct, or tend to obstruct, or render dangerous for passage, a lake, navigable river, bay, stream, canal or basin, or a public park, square, street, alley, highway, or municipal transit vehicle or station; or
in any way render a considerable number of persons insecure in life or the use of property[v].
Acts of public indecency, such as lewdness, exhibiting obscene pictures, standing naked on a balcony in a public place, conspiring to place a young woman in possession of another for purposes of prostitution, casting a dead body into a river, and the publication of an indecent book are indictable and punishable at common law because they outrage public decency and are injurious[vi].
In a nuisance committed by a tenant, the landlord is not liable for the independent criminal act of a tenant in the erection or continuance of a public nuisance. However, the landlord is liable for an action for damages for the erection or continuance of a private nuisance, either by himself, his/ her agents, or tenants, whereby private individuals are injured.[vii]
An indictment will lie for the erection or continuance of a nuisance or an unlawful obstruction on a public highway. All common and public nuisances, which aggrieve, annoy, or impair the common rights of the community must be punished criminally by indictment[viii].
Counties, municipalities, and other governing bodies in the prosecution of governmental functions are liable for damages resulting from the operation and maintenance of nuisances. A corporation is even criminally liable and can be prosecuted independently of the fact that the criminal act was performed by means of agents[ix]. A corporation is indictable for committing a public nuisance, whether the committing of the act involves nonfeasance or misfeasance[x].
In an action for a public nuisance, any evidence that tends to prove the defendant’s guilt of the offense charged is admissible. One need not have a criminal intent to make him guilty of committing a nuisance.
In an attempt to escape liability, a defendant can argue that a particular legislation authorizes his/her activity. However, legislative authority will not excuse a defendant from liability when the conduct is unreasonable.
However, a defendant cannot escape liability by arguing that others also contributed to the harm.
When a state does not prescribe punishment for a particular nuisance, the punishment is the one prescribed by statute for common-law offenses. Additionally, a person convicted for maintaining a nuisance of a continuing character is generally ordered to abate the nuisance together with a fine and imprisonment.
snip
so anything goes in the Capitol?
Then why are J6 people in jail?
They love the Country. why are they being persecuted for whom they love and how they were expressing their love?
God will not be mocked, what they sow will be reaped. God will vindicate those in the right, but in His timing which for some of us is the hard part.
ping to posts #24, 25, 27, 29
bio-hazard...
Good one.
8^)
“Democrat Staffer” Who Filmed Himself Having Sex in the Capitol Won’t Be Charged Because of Course”
Because as this article opened ... A Democrat Staffer
They know. How do you think the laws passed?
There are legion in the "Lindsey Lobby".
Sen. Ben Cardin, who employed the staffer, was allowed to simply drop the issue.
Pouring acid on civilized life style
it’s not about two adults’ having sex... its about two adults having sex IN THE CONGRESS HEARING ROOM.
And this whole article is about him having no consequences
did you read it at all?
it’s not about two adults’ having sex... its about two adults having sex IN THE CONGRESS HEARING ROOM.
And this whole article is about him having no consequences
did you read it at all?
For goodness sakes alive.... where is justice in DC?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.