She apologized “with prejudice.” She now has a denial on the record. If any info to the contrary is found to be provable she can revisit the issue. Meanwhile, the accusation is in the public domain.
She apologized “with prejudice.” She now has a denial on the record. If any info to the contrary is found to be provable she can revisit the issue. Meanwhile, the accusation is in the public domain.
Precisely!
Glad the hand wringers aren’t RPOTUS’ counsel.
no....’with prejudice” means no revival of the matter “in the same context as it was presented”.
Sometimes what one says is not what is intended to be inferred.
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Caesar. The noble Brutus
Hath told you Caesar was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Caesar answer’d it.
Here, under leave of Brutus and the rest–
For Brutus is an honourable man;
So are they all, all honourable men–
Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.
He was my friend, faithful and just to me:
But Brutus says he was ambitious;
And Brutus is an honourable man.Marc Antony's speech at Caesar's funeral