[bitt]

P

[rktman]

So just find them all guilty and be done with it. And, if you don’t condemn 1/6, you’re complicit in trying to destroy the capital and democracy!

[MTBobcat]

Let’s not forget these sham hearings were professionally produced for television and given prime time slots on major networks.

It was ridiculous at the time and gets even more ridiculous looking back on it.

[Tell It Right]

They ain’t “busted” until they go to prison like the Jan 6 political prisoners.

[1Old Pro]

Take the former Jan 6th committee members on a seemingly innocuous “tour” of the 1/6/ prisoner cells supposedly to admire their work, and when they ask why the one cell is empty, throw them all in and lose the key.

[BigFreakinToad]

isn’t that actionable? Oh wait, democrats did it, so it’s legal.

[brownsfan]

Got busted? That would indicate some kind of consequences for doing so. Ha!

[ByteMercenary]

democRATs don’t need no evidence - the law is what they say it is ...

[VTenigma]

Nobody is getting busted for anything. Life goes on, business as usual.

[UnwashedPeasant]

Remember, 1/6 was worse than 9/11.

What would happen if the 9/11 commission destroyed the counter-narrative evidence?

[traditional2]

As in ALL government-run scams and election thefts, "NO EVIDENCE EXISTS" is ALWAYS the Defense headline, in the Media they own..........ALWAYS. (Think Hillary, 2020 Vote Counting, etc.)

[MeanWestTexan]

Sounds like a crime. Send a referral, not that the DOJ would do anything.

[bray]

If Trump did that he would have another lawfare suit.

[Sequoyah101]

Got busted? Without consequence? That isn’t “busted”, just found out. Will we ever again punish people for violation of public trust and power? I don’t see it, not at all.

[ModelBreaker]

“Busted for Destroying More Evidence”

Busted in the sense of paying consequences?

Or busted in the sense of a news article that the media will ignore?

[GOPJ]

They’re thugs and goons and liars... so of course they would destroy evidence. The boys that used to protect us have gone dirty cop....

[Freee-dame]

Whenever important documents like these are destroyed, it must be because the penalty for destruction of documents is much less than the penalty for what the incriminating information that the documents would have exposed. I recall this happening during the Clinton administration, especially in the Chinese funny money hearings

[minnesota_bound]

They can all be locked up now right?

[ConjunctionJunction]

“failed to preserve any of its communications with the Biden White House”

The way this is worded makes it sound like it was an oversight. We known full well that it was intentional.