[Red Badger]

This weasel Smith and the judge who allowed this travesty should both be disbarred and charged with malfeasance......................

[Albion Wilde]

[stylin19a]

The options at this juncture are limited. Once informed of the search, President Trump could have intervened to protect claims of executive privilege, but did not, and so these issues are not properly before the en banc court

scratchin my head. Pres. Trump finds out after the fact ? and options are limited ?

An “en banc” review would have included the full 7 members. However, that review was made moot by the release of the information (a result of the appellate decision). The release itself was done with the use of a non-disclosure order, hiding the ruling in secrecy and keeping President Trump from knowing about it.

[bitt]

p

[kvanbrunt2]

It funny that Trump did not use personal email so that there would be no electronic (paper) trail of his communications. But used twitter. And Smith got the records directly from them via warrant and non disclosure. Warning to Trump don’t use twitter or any electronic communication. The precedent set is that any third party electronically can disclose confidential communication.

[lepton]

So the discussion notes that there are 11 Justices on the Court, not 7, and this appears to be a dissent.

[maddog55]

They should be hung on live TV...

I’d even pay Peacock $5.99 to see that.

[thingumbob]

Sounds like Smith is making enemies in a court that supposed to be packed with friends of Obozo.

Guessing that the next time Jack needs to bend the law he won’t be able to do it with the help of THIS DC court potentially in the future.

[SomeCallMeTim]

Wow! Look at all of those cows, OUT of the barn. Damn