Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Raskin: To know the law is to understand Trump is disqualified from office
NBC ^ | 1/5/24 | Lauren Steussy,Brent D. Griffiths

Posted on 01/06/2024 10:22:17 AM PST by DallasBiff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: DallasBiff

The truth is that every elected democrat nationwide is disqualified for political office.
The reason is simple; perjury. Every officeholder is required to take an oath to uphold the laws in their jurisdiction, whether local, county, state or federal, yet every elected democrat once in office does everything they can to ignore, overturn, nullify, eliminate, subvert or violate the terms of their office. Whether its municipal or town ordinances, or state or federal constitutions, members of this specific political party have been working for decades to destroy the Republic in whatever way they can.
That’s what makes them ‘disqualified’ from holding public office.
In fact, most of them should be prosecuted for their failure to uphold the law and the terms of their Oath of Office.


41 posted on 01/06/2024 11:49:32 AM PST by Thapsus_epiphany (Socialism is a prison, Communism is a death camp )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveyB

This sh*t stain is appearing everywhere now. He’s the DS designated mouthpiece.


42 posted on 01/06/2024 11:51:10 AM PST by Right Brother (Pray for God's intervention to stop UMCRevMom's invasion of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: x

NPR and Raskin did see fit to link Raskin’s sorrow over his son’s suicide with his determination to bring down President Trump after J6. Quite pitiful, but Raskin really thinks highly of himself, and NPR agrees.

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/04/1070032923/jamie-raskin-jan-6-capitol-unthinkable


43 posted on 01/06/2024 11:57:26 AM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

If you hate democracy, vote democrat. They will take care of it.


44 posted on 01/06/2024 12:13:02 PM PST by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Even if there was proof positive offered that Trump participated in an insurrection the amendment does not apply to ex presidents. That is the plain language which so many miss.


45 posted on 01/06/2024 12:26:35 PM PST by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

These Communists need to be put down.


46 posted on 01/06/2024 12:41:28 PM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Did you link to the wrong article? Where is the title you quoted in the article?


47 posted on 01/06/2024 1:12:21 PM PST by sunny bonobo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In the end the biggest losers will be Biden and all of those Republicans participating in this Biden manipulated primary instead of getting behind the victim of this election interference. If they really were against government control they would be saying “We are all Trump!”


48 posted on 01/06/2024 1:29:38 PM PST by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

“Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) tells MSNBC’s Jonathan Capehart that the question the Justices have to answer is: “are we going to follow the Constitution?””

This guy has been wearing his do-rag too tightly.


49 posted on 01/06/2024 2:05:47 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (“Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys” P.J. O’Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x; gloryblaze
Bet you could get a rise out of him if you speculated that to his face, though.

Enough for him to forget about his "concern" for his precious "law"..

50 posted on 01/06/2024 2:27:04 PM PST by kiryandil (Rocco is roccking again!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

When a rat swears allegiance to our Constitution, rest assured they’ll continue to lie.


51 posted on 01/06/2024 2:46:19 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Raskin has had his head rag on to tight to long he’s just another Joe Biden.


52 posted on 01/06/2024 3:04:47 PM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Yeah, rASSkin, that pesky Due Process Clause of the Constitution

Always getting in the way of state supreme courts and secy of state on Federal election issues


53 posted on 01/06/2024 3:32:10 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (What does the Deep State have on Dims and RINOs? Demand release of all tax returns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buck-Toothed Knuckle Dragger
My guess: 6-3 overturned.

The three probably being Sotomayor, Kagan, and Brown.

54 posted on 01/06/2024 3:33:04 PM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

RatSkin bleats.

/eyeroll


55 posted on 01/06/2024 4:57:17 PM PST by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

Good to know thine enemies.


56 posted on 01/06/2024 5:00:55 PM PST by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

That’s Baltimordor to those of us who know.


57 posted on 01/06/2024 5:06:03 PM PST by sauropod (The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

Too bad Ratskin doesn’t know the law.


58 posted on 01/06/2024 6:54:53 PM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lastchance
Even if there was proof positive offered that Trump participated in an insurrection the amendment does not apply to ex presidents. That is the plain language which so many miss.

I am not arguing with you, I just want to make sure I understand the argument about ex-presidents so I can use it.

Below is the text of the 14th Amendment, but I can't find it. Am I missing it, or are you talking about some other amendment?

Thanks.


Constitution of the United States

Fourteenth Amendment

Fourteenth Amendment Explained

Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5

The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


59 posted on 01/06/2024 8:03:08 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DallasBiff

“DISQUALIFIED FROM OFFICE?”

WTH does that mean? Isn’t that disqualified FOR office?

Raskin you are a MORON. GO AWAY.


60 posted on 01/06/2024 8:37:26 PM PST by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson