To: Dr. Sivana; AnthonySoprano
Trump Immunity Argument Would Allow Him to Order His Supporters to Murder Opposing LawmakersTrump's motion is for "absolute immunity" for "official acts." I fail to see how ordering the murder of anyone can be an "official act." I searched for "official act" on the web and found some examples, but no definition.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Trump's motion is for "absolute immunity" for "official acts." I fail to see how ordering the murder of anyone can be an "official act." I think that’s the perfect summary, well done. Meanwhile Jack Smith is exposing himself as a rabid illogical partisan more and more every day.
35 posted on
01/04/2024 10:47:24 PM PST by
Golden Eagle
(It is far easier to fool people, than to convince them they’ve been fooled.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
I fail to see how ordering the murder of anyone can be an "official act."
If I were Jack Smith, I would suggest that he could do it by labeling them domestic terrorists, and of course you know we can defend ourselves against domestic terrorists. It is the same rationale they are using to try to destroy Trump.
46 posted on
01/05/2024 5:43:45 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson