Posted on 12/20/2023 7:32:57 AM PST by Navy Patriot
The U.S. Supreme Court could rule "9-0" for President Donald Trump if he appeals the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling kicking him off the state's 2024 ballot, former White House lawyer Ty Cobb is predicting.
"I think this case will be handled quickly. I think it could be 9-0 in the Supreme Court for Trump," Cobb, who has served as a member of the Trump administration legal team, told CNN's Erin Burnett Tuesday after the ruling. "It will be a race to get there. I mean, the Supreme Court, though, will not hesitate to move quickly on this. They know what is at stake."
He also argued that the "law is clear" on the issue.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
This Ty Cobb is in the news 137 years (and one day) from TC’s birthday.
137 is the 33rd prime number - the ubiquitous (Phoenician) Masonic 33.
”9-0” > 9, a number prominently associated with baseball.
Baseball - the greatest game, is also a Masonic ritual.
https://www.remnantradio.org/Archives/articles/Baseball/baseball.htm
Numerology
The numerology aspect of baseball is something to look at closely because it relates directly to the sacred numbers. You will notice that almost all numbers related to baseball are multiples or divisors of 9.
3 strikes
3 outs
9 fielding positions
9 innings
27 outs per game (per team; 54 total)
81 home games
81 games on the road
In Freemasonry, nine derives its value from its being the product of three multiplied into itself, and consequently in Masonic language the number nine is always denoted by the expression three times three. For a similar reason, 27, which is 3 times 9, and 81, which is 9 times 9, are esteemed as sacred numbers in the advanced Degrees. -Masonic Dictionary
Every one is aware of the singular properties of the number nine, which, multiplied by itself or any other number whatever, gives a result whose final sum is always nine, or always divisible by nine. Nine multiplied by each of the ordinary numbers, produces an arithmetical progression, each member whereof, composed of two figures, and presents a remarkable fact.
9 . 18 . 27 . 36 . 45 . 54 . 63 . 72 . 81 . 90 So, 0+9=9, 1+8=9, 2+7=9 and so on. Also, there are mirrors of numbers that are important like 18 and 81, 27 and 72, 36 and 63, 45 and 54. For all those reasons, 9 and its multiples are considered sacred. The three bases represent the three degrees of the Blue Lodge, and in order to score or succeed the player must reach home plate in order to advance to the further degrees.
+1000!
Poor Ty Cobb is exhibiting the deleterious effects of playing pepper one too many times.
I expect 8-1 or 7-2. Jackson is likely to vote the wrong way. Karan is iffy.
I meant Kagan.
I am beginning to think this is just a Democrat MacGuffin, being used to detract attention from something else.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacGuffin
As someone else pointed out in another thread that the same ruling had a built in stay order which means President Trump will appear on the ballot (all he has to do is appeal the ruling and the stay continue until the Supreme Court rules).
There are several ways to look at this. Does the Supreme Court want to take away what has been a state right?
Does the Supreme Court want to block President Trump from being on any Democrat ran state’s ballots (because if it allows one state to keep Trump off, you know the others will do the same).
Or, option three, kick the can down the road until after the election and the case becomes moot?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacGuffin
It must come from Colorado in the form of impeachment and removal.
No question the Colorado Supremes are completely out of order. They denied Trump due process, accused him of an insurrection that never happened and Trump never convicted of an insurrection. Its time for politicized judges be purged.
(Don't worry, I'm not an FBI informant, and my fingers are not crossed)
Thanks, PJ!
I rarely get what I want most.
If Trump adds Harris’ citizenship problem to the filing, requesting she be denied valid candidacy due to immigration status, to ‘do unto others in reciprocation’, THAT would be hilarious!
Well that’s good, because I’d be interested in *seeing* it, not *doing* it!
And I won’t take that back. I *would* be interested in seeing it.
Understood.
“Pushback can’t come from SCOTUS other than the choice of wording in the decision.
It must come from Colorado in the form of impeachment and removal.”
Yes, but... pushback comes in many forms and can come from many sources... even if it takes a while to arrive. I’m thinking at some point in the future. But then again... perhaps I’m just dreaming.
SCOTUS Will Rule 9-0 in Colorado Case:“
It shows how naive these people are. He’s saying the rat judges are serious jurists who look at the law and deliberate in a reasoned manner. After all we have seen he still does not realize the rat SC Justices are nothing but political hacks. They know how they are going to vote before one word of testimony is heard. This will be 6-3 at best. A slight chance for 7-2, once in a while Kagen will
vote contrary to type for appearances.
The problem is that a bill passed by Congress cannot undue an amendment. Only another amendment can repeal a prior amendment.
It's the equivalent of a President's executive order replacing another executive order versus Congress passing a law.
In the case of the 14th amendment, the argument is whether the amnesty act only affected the participants in the Civil War or does it nullify the amendment going forward in perpetuity?
We know that no Congress can bind a future Congress. That means that Congress cannot pass a law preventing a future Congress from doing something. Only an amendment ratified by the states can do this. This means that an amnesty act cannot eliminate the insurrection clause of the 14th amendment for all future use.
-PJ
I heard Harris can’t keep her numbers up even using her Heels!
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
You raise very good points that may keep this within the courts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.