Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

SCOTUS Will Rule 9-0 in Colorado Case:“

It shows how naive these people are. He’s saying the rat judges are serious jurists who look at the law and deliberate in a reasoned manner. After all we have seen he still does not realize the rat SC Justices are nothing but political hacks. They know how they are going to vote before one word of testimony is heard. This will be 6-3 at best. A slight chance for 7-2, once in a while Kagen will
vote contrary to type for appearances.


36 posted on 12/20/2023 8:27:41 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: gibsonguy
A few years ago SCOTUS heard a case called "Caetano v Massachusetts".Caetano had been charged,and convicted, in state court for some kind of weapons offense.She appealed the conviction,on 2nd Amendment grounds,through the state courts and each one...including the state Supreme Court...upheld the conviction,ruling that her 2nd Amendment rights had not been violated.

The case then wound up in the Federal courts and SCOTUS agreed to hear it.

SCOTUS ruled 9-0 in Caetano's favor and in the narrative that went with the decision the court ruled that the state Supreme Court's reasoning in ruling that her 2nd Amendment rights hadn't been violated was "frivolous".

If a Maoist Supreme Court in Massachusetts can hand down frivolous rulings so can one in Colorado.

54 posted on 12/20/2023 9:29:08 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson