Posted on 12/20/2023 5:27:16 AM PST by cotton1706
#3) Instead of me writing it, let me screengrab it so we can all laugh together [pdf page 9].
Wait, what?
Yes, that’s correct. As long as President Trump appeals the decision to the Supreme Court, the appeals court stays their own ruling – essentially indefinitely. The Colorado primary ballots printed, and the primary election will be over, before the Supreme Court puts this on their docket.
In addition to the virtual guarantee the high court will overrule this political nonsense, SCOTUS can make the entire issue moot before them by following their own normal schedule for submissions, arguments, deliberation and opinions delivered by the court.
The Colorado appellate court knows this, that’s why they put this self-stay into their 4-3 ruling. It’s a politically correct way of giving the optics of telling their tribe, ‘hey we’re with you,’ without the ramifications of the political backlash. In other words, psychological lawfare stuff – intended for media consumption.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
They beclowned themselves.
4 black robbed scumbags need to have a reckoning.
Video
Donald Trump reacts to the Colorado Supreme Court removing him from the ballot: “Joe Biden is a threat to democracy”
https://rumble.com/v42al4a-donald-trump-reacts-to-the-colorado-supreme-court-removing-him-from-the-bal.html
Thanks for posting this.
What it does show though is, if they could.....they would
Good news for sure. Idiots. The woke don’t care.
Has to be overturned by SC. NEVER was a trial. Colorado SC convicted Trump without any trial.
This Trump paid propaganda website with that tired anonymous 2000
poster nonsense is garbage .
Go read a real legal decision at a legitimate source not this Garbage site .
How can a Court expect respect when they create this heaping pile of you know what? I guess that for the next decade the Colorado Supreme Court will be the laughing stock of jurisprudence… since they have violated the fourth body of jurisprudence which focuses on finding the answer to such abstract questions as “What is law?” and “How do judges (properly) decide cases?”
So the 4-3 decision was essentially anti-Trump porn for the media, Democrats, and RINO’s.
And, the rabid TDS filled NeverTrumpers (well, they ARE RINOs, at the very most :)
CO Ping.
We will do as we please but thanks for your input.
They obviously don't take their jobs seriously ... their jobs as judges, that is. As political hacks they're doing great.
The website has been around since pre-Trump days. (2010)
https://wptavern.com/wordpress-com-gives-conservative-treehouse-the-boot-citing-tos-violations
I think the dude's weird but he's been around longer than MAGA.
It is also being done to signal to their allies in other states that they should proceed with similar cases. It is lawfare. They are trying to hurt Trump politically before the primaries. They know this is a ridiculous judgment.
It will backfire.
“Go read a real legal decision at a legitimate source not this Garbage site .”
Rush Limbaugh quoted from that “garbage site.”
I see you still do not know how to handle a period at the end of the sentence. See this.
It was only meant to GRAB A HEADLINE TO DISTRACT from Hunter and Joe's corruption.
There are many here that fit into that category.
"But for our resolution of the Electors’ challenge under the Election Code,the Secretary would be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot.
Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the U.S. Supreme Court, we stay our ruling until January 4, 2024 (the day before the Secretary’s deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot). If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires on January 4, 2024, then the stay shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court."
READ IT FOR YOURSELF! https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf
I think you meant to reply to ncalburt(#7).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.