She could be read as sarcastic, in which case she goes over most people’s heads. At bottom, her craft is words and wit. That’s what she sells. To insult her looks simply because she is out of sync with group think is but a display of vapidity. That said, to seriously suggest or believe Epps was not complicit as an agent provocateur on J6 is to defy facts and logic altogether. Ann sure knows how to twist up her audience’s panties.
What audience?
Something has happened.
Ann was once credible. That is no longer true.
I don’t know what happened to her, but she is no longer a fighter for “truth and justice”, but a disruptor.
Sad...in a way.