To: IYAS9YAS
He was born in the U.S., but was not a citizen by birth because his parents were here under a diplomatic arrangement that is not covered by normal "citizen by birth" rules.
The headline is a bit misleading. He wasn't stripped of his citizenship. He never should have been recognized as a citizen in the first place.
14 posted on
11/28/2023 8:07:44 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
To: Alberta's Child
He was stripped, because he has been regarded as an American until this latest passport renewal. He has voted for POTUS, and you can’t do that if you’re not a citizen of the US.
25 posted on
11/28/2023 8:26:08 AM PST by
FamiliarFace
(I got my own way of livin' But everything gets done With a southern accent Where I come from. TPetty)
To: Alberta's Child
He was born in the U.S., but was not a citizen by birth because his parents were here under a diplomatic arrangement that is not covered by normal "citizen by birth" rules. The headline is a bit misleading. He wasn't stripped of his citizenship. He never should have been recognized as a citizen in the first place.I understand all that. The question I have is how did they grant him citizenship status in 1960? He's only 61. He'd have to have been 61 in 2021 for that to work.
32 posted on
11/28/2023 9:18:52 AM PST by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
To: Alberta's Child
36 posted on
11/28/2023 9:40:46 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
("There should have been an age and risk stratification approach." still true)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson