True- and one more weird part of chinese folk medicine- and you’re right- pangolin and bat SARS are not identical to SARS Cov2. And how odd this shows up, now, huh? Not wanting to rail a FRiend— but, here goes, deducted from colleagues collected data points who have connected many facts to form their highly informed opinions.
Historically, our own CDC investigators already in China for the yearly search to determine the next influenza season’s formula (every year sent in Fall- this one was in Fall 2019) identified a “Novel Coronavirus” on a subject Peoples Liberation Army soldier in Guangdong, and successfully got samples out of the country to... Fort Detrick Maryland (National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC)). This came from 500 plus miles away from Wuhan (and the fantasy “wet market” source created by chi-Coms and the WHO who took over the public labeling of what this was— ie. a bioweapon).
The CDC investigators published this “Novel Coronavirus Discovered....” The virus given the provisional name 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Once they got this publish ed— the Chicoms expelled all the CDC influenza investigators and all other CDC US people out of the country. And Chi-Com’s coopted pals in the WHO then labelled the virus as being FIRST discoverd in Hubei, China in ... Wuhan- a complete and utter lie, no surprise. The WHO working in sync with the chi-coms to quickly cover the actual location and.. of course the individual who was eliminated.
The investigators (who did not publish this)said the PLA infected soldier had been at the Mongolian border labor camp of Uyghurs. Concurrent with this discovered patient was the satellite data from our own NOAA and US monitoring satellites of sulphur dioxide smoke plumes rising from the labor camp coordinates- and quantified to the number of burning bodies (cross referenced from prior data from the Bangladesh Bay of Bengal typhoon which killed 138,000 people who were burned on funeral pyres in 1991. Sulphur dioxide particulate spectrographic correlates to the body count.. were applied to the Uyghur data). Result: estimated 65,000 Uyghurs were tested with the virus, and killed/burned.
All of this public info published online in late Fall 2019, has disappeared once the WHO operation took over in Dec. 2019 It’s clear the PLA tested this- screwed it up and infected PLA members. The virus was intended for Taiwan (pre-invasion)- and it failed in that regard. The vigilant Taiwanese let US know about it, thank the Lord.
One cannot find online the satellite info which NOAA put out— not since it was scrubbed in Dec. 2019. There may be some diligent FReepers who have screen saved what can no longer be accessed (so well managed was our derp state in their coordination).
The chi-coms are still at this- as evidenced by Xi’s recent visit to his employee’s country in San Francisco. Perfecting the next and doing zip about fentanyl manufactured by... themselves for export across our open borders. Asymmetric warfare is the definition of what they are doing, right now.
Competent warriors need to step up— if any are left w/in the DOD not eliminated by obamaumao the first, and silenced by joeybags of poop his puppet.
” pangolin and bat SARS are not identical to SARS Cov2. And how odd this shows up, now, huh? “
The genetic similarity between SARS-2, Chinese Rhinolophus bat viruses, and Chinese pangolin coronaviruses was reported as early as March 2020. It’s not new.
The original 2002-2004 SARS outbreak was believed to have originated with Chinese miners coming into contact with Horseshoe bats and they have been subjects of interest ever since. SARS-2 is similar but not identical to the original SARS.
Bat virus RaTG13 has 96% similarity to SARS-2 but can’t infect human tissue. Pangolin viruses with 91% similarity have a spike that can infect humans. A recombination of the two viruses could produce a SARS-2 virus without human intervention. RNA viruses are unstable and can do that, much like flu.
https://bmcmedgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12920-022-01208-w#:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2169-0