The article says that due to erroneous assumptions adverse events after 60 days would be missed. You seem to be adverse to reading comprehension. I believe it’s intentionally obtuse. Obtuse in this case meaning frustratingly slow to comprehend.
DariusBane wrote: “The article says that due to erroneous assumptions adverse events after 60 days would be missed.”
The authors provided no compelling evidence that this assumption was flawed. (Other than looking for something to advance their agenda.)