grey_whiskers wrote: (nothing important).
I see you’re back to your typical response of name calling instead of making substantive replies.
You’re a troll.
You don’t deserve substantive replies.
This way other posters know not to take you seriously.
OK, you win the prize for posting the MOST idiotic statement of the day, bad enough to warrant my first response in close to a decade:
“Three occurred in each group during the first 60 days; subsequently, five occurred in the vaccine group but just one in the placebo group.”
To which you responded:
IOW, since four of those deaths in the vaccine group were not caused by the vaccine, then there was no difference between the vaccine and the placebo groups.
So I assume that, being the fount of ALL knowledge about EVERYTHING, you have firmly established that correlation exists UP TO 28 days and ceases to exists AFTER 60 days. Since you omitted the state of affairs between those two ARBITRARY dates, we obviously should probably just ignore that issue as irrelevant.
Congrats to Grey Whiskers, he nailed your post 100% accurately. BTW, What’s with the “Dugway” part of you moniker? Are we supposed to be impressed that you are somehow associated with Dugway Proving Grounds and thereby are some sort of Technical Expert on BioChemical Matters???