Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/06/2023 9:52:07 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Could be?????


2 posted on 11/06/2023 9:54:31 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Smith’s budget needs to be zeroed out.


4 posted on 11/06/2023 10:03:41 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Question a BLATANTLY FRAUDULENT election and what do you get? 20 years.


7 posted on 11/06/2023 11:04:19 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The gag order was issued at the request of special counsel Jack Smith’s team of prosecutors, who claimed that the former president’s criticism of witnesses, the judge, prosecutors, and Washington itself threatened the integrity of their case.>>> Smith has admitted that he has such a flimsy case that the defendant can threaten the integrity of the case by criticizing the people prosecuting the case. I would file for complete dismissal based on this argument of the prosecution.


8 posted on 11/06/2023 11:30:28 PM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The Department of Justice is likely to lose at the Supreme Court for another reason. For the sake of due process and traditional cannons of statutory interpretation, the Court tends to disfavor expansive, non-obvious readings of statutes, especially when a criminal penalty is imposed. Otherwise, potential defendants have a hard time discerning in advance that their conduct is illegal. Lawyers and judges have a derisive term for when conduct is suddenly declared illegal by the government through clever, non-obvious statutory interpretation: “gotcha” justice.
9 posted on 11/07/2023 1:13:12 AM PST by Rockingham (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrat judges are like the German judges under Hitler. Yes, Mein Furher. Whatever you say mein furher.


10 posted on 11/07/2023 1:17:14 AM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
.....special counsel Jack Smith's team of prosecutors, who claimed that the former president's criticism of witnesses, the judge, prosecutors, and Washington itself threatened the integrity of their case.

This is nonsense, IMO. The 'persecution and its team' have no integrity. It's a political witch hunt where the persecution is allowed to put anything it wants out there to media and demands from a lickspittle, complicit judge that he gag the defense entirely. The defendant is innocent until PROVEN guilty in a court of law - this judge and persecution have already made up their minds and judgements before trial has even started on both sides.

11 posted on 11/07/2023 1:28:05 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
corruptly obstructing an official proceeding

You mean like stealing an election?

19 posted on 11/07/2023 2:27:05 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The writer forgets: the process is the punishment.

Smith doesn't care if he gets the conviction, the process and muddying up Trump as much as possible is the goal.

That's why Trump's being attacked by multiple, corrupt District and State Attorneys.

They think they're keeping him so busy 'n distracted that his campaign will suffer and fail as a result.

Fools.

20 posted on 11/07/2023 2:29:50 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Unless I’m mistaken Alan Dershowitz has said that any convictions in this case will be overturned by the appeals courts.


23 posted on 11/07/2023 4:09:22 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: Banana Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

No shit Sherlock.


25 posted on 11/07/2023 4:15:56 AM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

As Red Skelton might have said on one of his old shows...”That guy Jack Smith ..just don’t look right to me”


26 posted on 11/07/2023 5:35:21 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s a matter of opinion and freedom of speech. The government has no say in this.


27 posted on 11/07/2023 6:07:00 AM PST by DownInFlames (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Either way, this issue will likely end up before the United States Supreme Court because it is a novel issue that affects hundreds of criminal defendants, including the former president.

Loophole lawyers hiss


29 posted on 11/07/2023 6:53:18 AM PST by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Ya think? 🙄


30 posted on 11/07/2023 7:56:28 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson