If the child’s disease is always fatal, and it appears so, perhaps it would be better to allow her to peacefully pass.
I can’t argue that however, the bloodlust displayed by some national “healthcare” systems shows their over eagerness to kill off anyone they deem dispensable.
too often they seem more interested in just eliminating those with health issues instead of finding a treatment or cure for them.
The parents want their child to live and have hope I will go with them the next POTUS will have to deal with the British government I saw Mike Pence limp when another child was put to death by the UK.
President Trump seemed a bit more interested than Pence.
If I were POTUS it would be Suez Crisis and beyond for the British government until they change their minds about such matters.
I've read of a couple of these cases where an innovative treatment was offered by the U.S. or another European country, but the UK courts ordered the child to remain in the custody of their socialist NHS hospitals that had no further options to try; their "death panels" didn't want the expense.
One boy even had a million dollars of funding committed by Americans in order to come here and at least try to be treated, but UK courts made him die.
While it may be true that some of these attempts may be futile, it's also true that conscientious attempts at treatment contribute to greater understanding of diseases for the help of future patients.