Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sasquatch

Requiring a BC for ammo purchases and limiting the amount of ammo is one thing in their tiny, gun grabbing minds masquerading as some sort of a way to keep potential active shooters from getting what they want. However, the additional requirement that a SEPARATE FFL for ammo sellers be required even though a gun seller FFL can do the SAME BCs shows that the legislation isn’t about ‘safety’ - nothing but gun grabbing or denial of 2A rights.

I think this USSC would invalidate the law as unconstitutional if it were to get passed into law.


22 posted on 11/04/2023 8:20:44 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

They are not in the least concerned with mass shooters or any other type of criminal activity. The sole purpose of this POS is to further infringe on our 2nd amendment rights.


43 posted on 11/04/2023 9:02:21 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson