Posted on 11/01/2023 9:41:05 PM PDT by bitt
Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday afternoon attended a hearing in Fort Pierce, Florida on whether Judge Cannon will agree to postpone the classified documents trial currently scheduled for May 2024.
Judge Cannon signaled she may postpone Trump’s trial. She also admonished one of Jack Smith’s prosecutors, according to Julie Kelly who attended Wednesday’s hearing.
Trump’s lawyers dropped bombshell revelations during the hearing on Wednesday, according to reporter Julie Kelly.
Julie Kelly attended the hearing in person on Wednesday. According to Kelly, Trump’s lawyers revealed:
Trump’s lawyers told Judge Cannon they discovered a June 2023 letter asking DOE to remove Trump’s ACTIVE SECURITY CLEARANCE.” – A few weeks AFTER Smith handed down classified documents indictment.
Trump’s lawyers told Judge Cannon this afternoon they have evidence that the Biden White House collaborated with NARA, DOJ, and intel agencies to determine which documents to include in Jack Smith’s indictment. Trove of evidence includes “years” worth of security footage from MAL
Evidence of “extensive communications” between White House, NARA, intel agencies and DOJ/Jack Smith prior to the indictment to determine which classified files to include.
Trump still had DOE security clearance related to at least one charged document as recently as June 2023.
•Defense might include the Secret Service as a considered member of prosecution since they have their own security apparatus separate from MAL
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
“MAL” Mar-a Lago. Article does not define abbreviation.
Mar-a-Lago
Baloney it hasn't. They found classified documents at Biden's residences in Delaware and the Penn Biden Center.
Not to mention take photos with Delta Force operators in Israel and POST THEM ON THE INTERNET.
Indeed
Yes they were found. I wasn’t denying that. Just noting the investigation remains open unlike Pence’s which was closed.
It makes it even more impressive to think back on how Edward Snowden managed to elude the many tendrils of the DeepState.
“But it was perfectly OK for El Retardo to carelessly stash classified documents in open boxes next to his Corvette...”
Similarly, NONE the FBI agents who invaded MaL could legally inspect documents to even determine if they were responsive to the warrant. Yet we saw neatly staged photos of documents during the raid. The Trump legal team should petition Judge Cannon to compel the FBI to document that ALL participating agent access was pre-authorized.
I expect to (eventually) be arrested for creating the #PedoDementoCorruptoCrat
hashtag on Twitter, back before being suspended on that January 6th, with all the other anons.
This is straight from “Person of Interest”. The main character also created the first ‘social network’, realizing that while people are wary of giving the government private information about themselves, their family, their location, those same people are more than happy to put that information on the ‘social network’ of the internet for anyone and all to see.
A bombshell report by the Electronic Freedom Foundation (EFF) revealed the “vast, secretive” partnership between private companies and the federal government to surveil and track the movements of millions of Americans.
According to the EFF, the intel alphabet agencies, including ICE, the FBI, US Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Defense (DoD), as well as state and local law enforcement, are being funneled hordes of private cell phone location data by private brokers who harvest the information.
The vengeful Biden has his own Stasi.......
doesnt like it when people say he stole his election.
And a discouraging word about his no-good crackhead son?.......yikes.
Great catch. If Biden retroactively classified the documents, did he remember to grant the proper security clearances to the agents? If not, they need to be prosecuted for unauthorized access to classified documents. LOL!!!
Mar-A-Lago
What is MAL?
When there is no law, then there is no law.
Only massive body guards protect the Biden family from no law
Bogus case from the start. A competent judge would summarily dismiss.
H/T
Oratam
Article I, Section 9, Clause 3:
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Commentary
Separate provisions of the Constitution ban enactment of ex post facto laws by the Federal Government and the states, respectively. The Supreme Court has cited cases interpreting the federal Ex Post Facto Clause in challenges under the state clause, and vice versa, implying that the two clauses have the same scope. The Court has construed both clauses to ban legislatures from enacting laws that impose criminal liability or increase criminal punishment retroactively. The constitutional prohibitions of ex post facto laws are closely related to the prohibitions of bills of attainder—legislative actions that determine guilt or impose criminal punishment on specific persons or groups without a judicial trial. In some cases, the Court has held that a single legislative action may violate both the ex post facto and bill of attainder prohibitions.
Would the actions of the Executive fall under this? Perhaps the Supreme Court will need to determine if they do.
Biden and his thugs and goons are a disgrace to the nation...
Did the President order a criminal act weaponize the law to destroy a rival?
In so doing, did he forfeit his right to life by betraying the Oath of Office and the Republic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.