Skip to comments.
Appalachian hydrogen hub gets green light, and up to $925 million, from feds
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^
| October 13, 2023
| Anya Litvak and Jonathan Salant
Posted on 10/13/2023 4:50:25 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: bert
More power to them no pun.
21
posted on
10/13/2023 8:02:48 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
(....)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Pretending hydrogen can be converted from H2O, then isolated and stored without massive use of energy that could have been used without conversion losses = “Something for Nothing”
Wasting $750 million this project = “Nothing for Something”.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Mini-Hindenburg cars/trucks across america?
Kind like flaming EVs?
The stuff IS explosive, you know?
And requires special handling.
23
posted on
10/13/2023 10:20:40 AM PDT
by
Taxman
(SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2023 AND 2024!)
To: bert
Not the only ones, I am sure.
24
posted on
10/13/2023 11:48:22 AM PDT
by
vpintheak
(There is no Trans. There is only mentally ill)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Hydrogen plus Oxygen equals water,which will be in vapor form. H2O is by far the most potent of greenhouse gases.
25
posted on
10/13/2023 12:50:35 PM PDT
by
Thunder90
(All posts soley represent my own opinions)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Yeah, I thought water vapor was supposed to be worse than CO2.
26
posted on
10/13/2023 2:50:11 PM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: vpintheak
Follow the money. Exactly who is behind these businesses that is getting this money? I believe we will have our answer.
It's not as nefarious as you think.
I was on the team that helped write the proposal for this. The government issues an RFP and industry responds. There were 60+ team members on this bid if I recall. Some companies just like government money and will build a fantastic team to make it happen. Just doing business with the government can be lucrative.
27
posted on
10/13/2023 7:32:53 PM PDT
by
tenger
(If we don't stay on 'em, they'll get it wrong. -Joe Soucheray)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Biden tripped 3 times going up a few steps while there.
28
posted on
10/13/2023 11:01:12 PM PDT
by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: minnesota_bound
29
posted on
10/13/2023 11:04:15 PM PDT
by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: minnesota_bound
30
posted on
10/13/2023 11:07:30 PM PDT
by
minnesota_bound
(Need more money to buy everything now)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
carbon capture and storage The truth they can't ever mention is it's mostly oxygen capture and storage. The future belongs to people with big noses.
31
posted on
10/13/2023 11:42:28 PM PDT
by
Reeses
To: Still Thinking
Yeah, I thought water vapor was supposed to be worse than CO2. Whatever water vaoir we add through hydrogen combustion, fossil combusttion, etc is trivial compared to global evaporation. All the water vapor that is lost in rainfall is quickly replaced naturally. Our contribution is negigible.
So yes, while water vapor is a much more important greenhouse gas, there's nothing we can do to increase it. In contrast the rise from 280 to 420 ppm of CO2 is mostly manmade.
32
posted on
10/14/2023 10:02:44 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson