From a Bushmaster
There is nothing controversial about an AR-15 or any weapon. It is designed to kill. Government better heed that if they attempt to do something controversial like denying Americans their 2a rights.
From a Bushmaster
Well the Obamanation and his lackey Joe “the Big Guy” Biden certainly took care of that issue.
bkmk
It doesnt matter the gun
They have just locked onto this one as a symbol
Its a focal point for rally
So keep using it and carrying it where you can
Bkmk/ar 15
Carried one for four years, the original one with splayed flash suppressor and no forward assist. Cleaned 30 per shift as an armorer (as well as 30 S&W K-38 and 4 M-60’s). Never had ammo problems despite shooting up multiple cans of 5.56 to avoid inspection gigs. Reliable weapon from my experience. Article failed to mention the modularity factor that makes it popular.
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
It’s not really controversial.
The left makes that claim over anything it doesn’t approve of.
We have to stop allowing them to control the narrative and the language.
The AR-15 was created for the U.S. military in the 1950s
No it wasn't. The AR-15 IS and was ALWAYS strictly a civilian rifle. Not one military in the world has ever adopted the AR-15.
Civilian AR-15s sold in the U.S. are semiautomatic.
No. ALL AR-15's are civilian and are semiautomatic. What the military used are M-16s and now M-4s. They have select fire capability. They are NOT AR-15s.
The article keeps talking about "civilian versions of the AR-15." They're ALL civilian versions or they are not AR-15s. There's no such thing as a military version of an AR-15. Those are not AR-15s.