Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lujan Grisham to sheriff: "I don't need a lecture on constitutionality"
Hot Air ^ | 9/12/23 | Ed Morrissy

Posted on 09/12/2023 9:09:21 AM PDT by CFW

Oh, but you do, you do. Michelle Lujan Grisham got steamed yesterday when the Bernalillo County Sheriff declared her order suspending the US Constitution unlawful and refused to enforce the New Mexico governor’s edict to arrest people carrying firearms in an otherwise lawful manner.

Sheriff John Allen, who apparently attended a civics class or two more than Lujan Grisham, went public with his refusal yesterday, and further stated that he’d tried to warn Lujan Grisham that she didn’t have the authority to issue the order:

[snip]

“I don’t need a lecture on constitutionality from Sheriff Allen: what I need is action. What we need is for leaders to stand up for the victims of violent crime. We need law enforcement, district attorneys, public officials, school leaders and state agencies to use every single tool at their disposal to stop this violence. Period.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; constitution; despot; dictator; governor; impeachment; michellelujangrisham; newmexico; oathbreaker; police; tyrant; yesyoudo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: TiGuy22

You have to boil a frog slowly. Heat it too fast and he jumps out. The Oompa Loompa floated this trial balloon and the reaction was too severe so the other leftists are trying to reel it back in. Had this worked the next public health crisis would be “misinformation” or “racism” and the 1st amendment would be gone as well.


61 posted on 09/12/2023 1:26:20 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

Don’t just sue the arresting officer, sue Grisham and the officer personally. How can making a flagrantly unconstitutional act be considered part of one’s official duties when such acts are barred? How can a state official claim the right to act outside the US Constitution when they’d sworn an oath to uphold it. They must logically be considered personal acts, not falling under the umbrella provided for acts taken per the rights and duties of a sovereign office. Argument should also apply to any such arresting officer whether or not you correctly recall NM LEO immunity law.


62 posted on 09/12/2023 3:10:56 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Biden/Harris events are called dodo ops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I agree with her on one statement she said, “use all tools at their disposal” to solve the issues. The issue is that she is not using a tool “at their disposal”, she is creating whole new tools, which are ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!

What part of this does this idiot not understand?!?

Where are the New Mexican residences? Why aren’t they marching on the State Capital demanding this woman either rescind this ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL order or RESIGN IMMEDIATELY?!?


63 posted on 09/12/2023 6:15:32 PM PDT by ExTxMarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson