I cannot access Yahoo from where I am at, what is Big Lie Number Two?
we are lyin’ dog faced pony soldiers
according to stupid joe
Was expecting Covid v2
The 2020 election was so hopelessly corrupt as to be invalid.
The chickenshit indictments cannot have any other purpose than “get Trump”.
The author is out of touch with reality.
CIA trying again on Big Lie
You should have just excerpted the “Big Lie two” or at least tell the gist of it. I don’t want to go to some liberal rag to find out what it is.
In the social media, there is still a very concerted effort to attack Trump and turn people against him. Yesterday, I found a question in the French language section of Quora which asked why do so many people still support Trump despite the many indictments against him? I answered that it’s because his supporters don’t think he is guilty of anything and that they view him as a victim of political persecution similar to what happens in China, Cuba, and North Korea.
THE NEW REPUBLIC!
This is a crap post penned by an idiot. Not you, but most don’t care about this guy.
The biggest shock in the op-ed comes when the a$$hole quotes Orwell saying, “unmistakable facts right in front of our noses” re: Trump indictments.
If he had anything but manure for brains, he’d know how thoroughly that Orwell phrase applies to the corruption of the cadaver-in-chief.
Do not lizten to zem, ze are LIARZ!
Big lie 1, Trump colluded with Russia to win the election. 2. The Steele dossier, 3. Hunter’s laptop, 4. Trump told people to drink bleach, 5....
“though thankfully, they constitute a clear minority of voters”
I’ve seen a couple of polls recently that suggest a majority of likely voters think 2020 was stolen.
FYI All: “The New Republic” is a communist magazine!
Published 9:07 AM EDT, Sat October 17, 2020
That system of touch screens, printers and scanners was the subject of a sprawling lawsuit filed in the Northern District of Georgia in which plaintiffs claimed that the BMDs are insecure and prone to technical malfunctions and do not allow voters to visually verify that the BMD has in fact marked their ballots as they intended.
On the eve of the beginning of early voting, Judge Amy Totenberg denied the plaintiffs’ request to switch the entire state from using BMDs to hard-marked paper ballots, ruling that a change of that magnitude so close to the start of voting risked throwing the election into chaos.
Still, Totenburg’s ruling contained harsh words about the reliability and security of Georgia’s BMD system.
In conclusion, Totenberg wrote, “Plaintiffs’ challenge to the State of Georgia’s new ballot marking device QR barcode-based computer voting system and its scanner and associated software presents serious system security vulnerability and operational issues that may place Plaintiffs and other voters at risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote that is accurately counted.”
“The Commission’s Collection of State Voter Data
The Commmission’s June 28, 2017 letter to state election officials was unprecedented. Such a request for sensitive voter data had never been made by a federal official in the history of the country. The Commission sought ‘voter roll data’ including:
the full first and last names of all registrants, middle names or initials if available
addresses
dates of birth
political party (if recorded in your state)
last four digits of social security number if available
voter history (elections voted in) from 2006 onward
active/inactive status, cancelled status
information regarding any felony convictions
information regarding voter registration in another state
information regarding military status, and
overseas citizen information.”
https://epic.org/documents/epic-v-presidential-election-commission/
States such as Florida have such information for each of their residents.
Why should the United States collectively have been denied such information useful for cleaning up voting rolls?
The IRS mutually shares with the states far more detailed information.
Private equity firms reportedly own or control each of these vendors, which “have long skimped on security in favor of convenience,” leaving voting systems across the country “prone to security problems.”
“These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”
What a pile of crap.
Tomasky is just a Progressive/Leftist mouth piece.
Nothing interesting, challenging or inspiring emanates out of his head.
Actually quite boring.
They are what they pretend to oppose; they did what they denounce.