I agree with your statement on trial date of 2025.
BUt once Trup achieves office, I also believe the cases will wither away.
People forget so easily that the facts concerning election fraud have never been adduced before a court of law, there was not even ONE doiscovery proceeding allowed by either feeral or state courts.That was a travesty of Justice.
If these various cases go to trial there are reams of evidence indicating fraud in the 2020 election whiic will be factual submissions on discovery.
The secure document case is fatally flawed because the feds
did not exhaust all administrative remedies and simply initiated a criminal case on what statutorily was a civil matter concerrning presiidential records..
Here is one from Georgia:
********************************************************
What truly happened in Georgia so that Trump and his team were justified in challenging the election result....the facts?
There was fraud;
Fani Willis is indicting Trump and his team in order to obscure the truth.
The magic words: “Ruby Freeman and Shaya Moss” ( protected by the MSM spin and law suits initiated by the Dem Party)
This truth would come out at discovery if there is a trial. President Trump welcomes the indictments.
*********************************************
Navarro Report
Page 11 of 86 :
www.dropbox.com/s/584r7xtnngauc4t/The%20Navarro%20Report%20Vol%20I%2C%20II%2C%20III%20-%20Feb.%202%2C%202021.pdf?dl=0
**********************************************
“Arguably the most flagrant example of possible fake ballot manufacturing on behalf of Joe Biden may have occurred at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia. The possible perpetrators were caught in flagrante delicto on surveillance video.
In one version of this story, poll watchers and observers as well as the media were asked to leave in the middle of the night after a suspicious water leak. Once the room was cleared, several election officials pulled out large boxes of ballots from underneath a drapedtable. They then proceeded to tabulate a quantity of fake manufactured ballots estimated to be in the range of tens of thousands.
17
Note that a large surge in Biden votes following the tabulation of these ballots can be clearly observed after these votes were processed.
18
Despite what appears to be damning evidence of a possible crime, a spate of stories appeared across the anti-Trump media diaspora dismissing any concerns. According to these whitewash stories, these were regular and authorized ballot boxes, observers in the media were not asked to leave but simply left on their own, and it is perfectly acceptable to count ballots in the absence of observers.
19
Or so the spin goes.Of course, this is precisely the kind of incident that should be fully investigated both by Georgia’s Attorney General as well as by the Federal Department of Justice. Yet it remains unclear as to whether such investigations are underway. Meanwhile,the videotape itself, absent an adequate explanation, has contributed to the current climate of skepticism surrounding the fairness and integrity of the election........”
See video:
“Georgia Voter Fraud starring Ruby Freeman - CAUGHT ON TAPE”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moddNvyr3To
“In one version of this story, ... election officials pulled out large boxes of ballots from underneath a draped table. They then proceeded to tabulate a quantity of fake manufactured ballots ....”
It’s not a “version of the story”. It’s on video for God and everyone to see clearly. Except they weren’t boxes; they were suitcases.
According to Robert Barnes, here is what happened not only in GA but in many states’ challenges.
Barnes was set to participate in this challenge, but said it quickly became clear that Lin Wood and Sidney Powell were taking things in the direction of Dominion. Barnes has been emphatic: IT WAS NOT THE MACHINES, it was as he put it “good old fashioned ballot stuffing” through the mules, and that the machines were red herring. So he pulled out.
Here was the extensive petition Barnes drafted, but then he pulled out before filing this. I believe he is right. I think there may have been, as in AZ, some “tricksies” with either the vote counting outfit or people going in afterwards from the BoS, but so far no one has proven even before the AZ leg that the machines were tampered with-—and remember we have physical ballot backup and match. So any #s changed in machines would somehow have also had to have been changed first with the paper ballots, which is why I’m with Barnes on this.
The only way to get to the bottom is for a court to FORCE signature match of over 10,000 ballots. Normally about 3% are “bad.” But if we find over 3%, then something was fishy.