Which probably means it was a CIA op and this is deflection.
My first thought upon reading this. I wouldn’t have been surprised for Prigozhin to be taken out, but doing so with other passengers and crew aboard strikes me as the kind of broad brush technique used in smear campaigns. Idk what to think.
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Biden suggests Putin could be behind Russian plane crash, EnderWiggin1970 wrote: |
Which probably means it was a CIA op and this is deflection. |
That might be right.
When the Wagner boss abandoned his 'march on Moscow' there were some theorizing that the CIA put him up to it. That's right when they found an 'accounting error' that gave the Ukraine a few billion. So the idea suggested was the CIA paid Wagner and Wagner either took the money and marched the men, or told Putin who counter offered and the march broke up. Right after the march broke up, the Russian gov twitter account chastised the west (cia) for other similar failures (afghanistan etc.)
While Putin could down the plane, I would think he would target his adversary more specifically - he's not shy and would want people to know it was him, to make an example. Killing an entire planeload of people would infuriate the families of innocents. This would help the CIA continue to assert that anything wrong in the world is 1)Trump or 2) Putin.
Which probably means it was a CIA op and this is deflection.
Right on the heels of Wagner helping in Africa, esp Niger.
People here are not usually able to think that far. Thanks.