[DoodleBob]

T “Social justice warrior,” for example, didn’t start off as an insult. What’s wrong with someone fighting on behalf of the poor and exploited? Then the term was turned by conservatives and internet culture into something else: a “whiny,” self-righteous progressive who can’t take a joke.

[Steely Tom]

It’s nice that they tell us we’re really getting to them.

What a bunch of dim bulbs, I swear.

[FamiliarFace]

***What’s wrong with someone fighting on behalf of the poor and exploited?***

Nothing is wrong with that, it’s just that we define “poor and exploited” differently than they do.

For example, I think that children who are being groomed by their teachers about trans-ideology are the ones who are being exploited, but the left think it’s the trans teachers who are exploited.

I think that children who are sex-trafficked are the exploited, but they think I should care about the perverts and pedophiles who are exploiting these children.

The poor are those of us for whom Joe Burden and his horrible administration are screwing royally, in every which way. The left doesn’t care about the real poor. If they did, their behaviors and “programs” would be very different.