[DoughtyOne]

LOL

Ah, I think you have a different sense of what an attack is
than I and the Ukrainians do.

[icclearly]

Ah, I think you have a different sense of what an attack is than I and the Ukrainians do.

I think you avoided the question.

My comment: In reply to "None of this would be happening.....if Pootin had kept his armies home, was..

"...like we should have kept our army and navy at home back in the early 1960s when we invaded Cuba and sent our navy...to meet the Russkies (blockade)."

You said: "So if the U. S. is attacked, the U. S. should just surrender?"

Please be so kind as to answer why it is NOT okay for Pootin to invade Ukraine when threatened with an ever-expanding NATO with missiles placed right on his border and with Ukraine planning nukes?