Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Putin’s Russia cannot accept its borders
Atlantic Council ^ | August 11th, 2023 | Glenn Chafetz, John Sipher

Posted on 08/11/2023 10:09:13 PM PDT by Cronos

To understand Russia’s current obsession with Ukraine, it is important to recognize that Russia was never a state in the common usage of the term. Unlike the modern Turkish state that emerged from the Ottoman Empire, or Great Britain, which acquired and lost an empire, Russia never had an identity separate from empire. As British historian Geoffrey Hosking observed, “Britain had an empire, but Russia was an empire.”

The Kremlin’s preferred narrative of Russia rising from present-day Ukraine (“Kyivan Rus”) is a Moscow-concocted fairy tale. The officially endorsed 1000-year history of Russia is a self-created and self-perpetuated myth that generations of Russian dictators have promoted to justify their external expansion and internal repression.

Instead, what we think of today as Russia started out as a loose collection of independent city states that included Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk, Tver, and Moscow, the last of which attained particular significance toward the end of Mongol rule a little over 500 years ago. Kyiv was no more a part of Russia then than it is now. There was no common language, no common administration, and no joint identity. Indeed, it would be centuries before the rulers of Muscovy attempted to assert their dominance over Kyiv and the lands of today’s Ukraine.

...Under Ivan III (“The Great”), Muscovy established itself as the strongest of the city states to emerge from the Mongol period. Ivan called himself “Tsar of all Rus,” but he was actually more like the mayor of Greater Moscow. It was Ivan who started the expansion of Muscovy, initiating the so-called “gathering of Russian lands.”

...Expansion demands inward Russification and repression, and further outward expansion. As Catherine the Great famously said, “I have no way to defend my borders but to extend them.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Russia; Ukraine
KEYWORDS: atlanticcouncil; glennchafetz; globalistpropaganda; johnsipher; orseem2win; russia; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-226 next last
To: popdonnelly

“Why is it considered a Freeper conservative value to support Putin and Russia.”


should we be supporting Biden and Globohomo ?


101 posted on 08/12/2023 3:52:10 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

“The Atlantic Council”

Propaganda much?


102 posted on 08/12/2023 3:55:40 AM PDT by foundedonpurpose (Praise Hashem, for his restoration of all things! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright







103 posted on 08/12/2023 4:04:20 AM PDT by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Czech_Occidentalist

“What has happened to the American conservative movement? Where are the intellectual giants like William Buckley and Frank S. Meyer? .”


What happened is those types of conservatives were totally defeated and the Left took over every major institution in the country.

And so you have a defeated conservatism in America that you think is supposed to be exercised over who does what to who in Ukraine.

Meanwhile the USA has an uncontrolled sourthern border with hundreds of thousands from Asia and Africa crossing every month.

And every major city is in absolute squalor and chaos.

Repub elites tell us $5 billion for the Trump Wall is “too expensive” then they turn around and vote another $25 bill for Ukraine.

And Mike Pence is worried about not enough weapons for Ukraine, but he says the state of US cities is “Not my concern.”


104 posted on 08/12/2023 4:06:28 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright


"That is the folly of NATO and it should have been disbanded in 1991."


USSR fell in December of 1991.
NATO should have dissolved no earlier than 1992... But it would have taken months, if not years.
I would put it at 1994, as a more reasonable date.
105 posted on 08/12/2023 4:07:55 AM PDT by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

thanks !


106 posted on 08/12/2023 4:09:19 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

Putin rejects them both, and that is good enough for me.


Really? Are you even a conservative? Almost all societies in human history have rejected “Globohomo”. Were they good just because they rejected “Globohomo”? Was the American Revolution wrong? The British rejected “Globohomo” at that time too. Was the idea of limited government proposed by the Founding Fathers unnecessary?

Why are some people so consumed by the “Globohomo” issue that they can’t see ANYTHING else? I mean being pro-life is even more important than being against “Globohomo”. Ultimately, people can refuse to participate in homosexual acts, but an unborn baby can’t refuse to participate in an abortion.


107 posted on 08/12/2023 4:10:14 AM PDT by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

The fallacy of the excluded middle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma


108 posted on 08/12/2023 4:17:39 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Czech_Occidentalist
Ultimately, people can refuse to participate in homosexual acts, but an unborn baby can’t refuse to participate in an abortion.

The two go together. There would be no “unwanted pregnancies” if Globohomo had not foisted a relentless campaign to dechristianize America through sexual deviancy. Do you have children who are being groomed by Sodomites? American families do.
109 posted on 08/12/2023 4:19:36 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Some Freepers will probably tell you that Richard Pipes was a neocon and warmonger, and therefore he shouldn’t be trusted.


110 posted on 08/12/2023 4:20:47 AM PDT by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Nobody was confident that the ex-USSR would not collapse in such a way as to become, again, a threat to its neighbors. It was an unstable situation.

Ironically it was Putin that created a degree of order and stability, 20 years ago. But then Putin, and the situation, devolved.


111 posted on 08/12/2023 4:21:02 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Czech_Occidentalist

Globohomo is actually short for Globalist Homogenization.

And it covers much more that just LGBT imperialism.

It is forcing every country in every region to adopt the same secularism, the same open borders, the same corporations, the same “democracy”, the same type of progressive politicians and judges, the same trade deals, use the same social media, buy the same products, live in cities that look the same filled with buildings the same as every other city.

So you have people in every city in the world that looks the same and there is so much immigration and homozenization that you can’t even tell what country you are in !

And the worse part of it is, you cannot reject any of it or you get sanctions, a proxy war or a Color Revolution.

Oh yeah, unrestricted abortion is also part of the Globohomo agenda.


112 posted on 08/12/2023 4:21:18 AM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Everything touched by progressives, dies !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Czech_Occidentalist

Worse, he was a Polish Jew!

A lot of the pro-Russian commentary on FR is explicitly or implicitly antisemitic.


113 posted on 08/12/2023 4:27:08 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

What? During the Second World War Russia (The Soviet Union), the US and the UK were fighting on the same side. After the war ended, Russia became expansionist again and wanted to seize all Europe. To prevent Russia from doing that, NATO was established.


114 posted on 08/12/2023 4:38:35 AM PDT by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

No, “homo” is there for its explicit meaning. And its not an unfair meaning.

On the other hand, it is agitprop. And it is a lie, on the whole. Propaganda of an effective sort takes a part of the truth and emphasizes it disproportionately from all other truths, rejecting perspective.

The Soviet Union for instance made propaganda hay with US civil rights and racism problems. As have the “liberal”, “progressive” or “woke” propaganda lines.

Its the same rhetorical strategy.


115 posted on 08/12/2023 4:43:00 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Well, we in Central and Eastern Europe know much about Russia from personal experience, thank you very much. For us, Russia means despotism, serfdom and poverty.


116 posted on 08/12/2023 4:44:21 AM PDT by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright
No problem 😉
117 posted on 08/12/2023 4:45:06 AM PDT by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

“Why Putin’s Russia cannot accept its borders”

Actually, Russia did accept its borders for decades...as long as Russians trapped in other countries were treated reasonably well. Nuland made sure that WAS NOT the case in Ukraine, so here we are...


118 posted on 08/12/2023 4:50:01 AM PDT by BobL (Trump has all the right Enemies; DeSantis has all the wrong Friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
That is why I suggested that 1994 would have been best.


We have NO idea what would have happened either way if this had taken place. But, Russia would not have felt threatened if it had, and it could have been MUCH different if it did.

I can't (and can no one else) speculate what the outcome would have been.
119 posted on 08/12/2023 4:50:24 AM PDT by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

Are you trying to claim that Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland have nothing to fear even though they can see in real time what Russia is doing in Ukraine to re-establish its empire? Russian propagandists on TV openly say that Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and even Poland are part of the (Russian) Fatherland.


120 posted on 08/12/2023 4:56:50 AM PDT by Czech_Occidentalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson