***click***
Hope it went through..(Only Time Will Tell)...
Posted on 07/27/2023 1:23:56 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Trevor Sutcliffe @TrevorSutcliffe
Vivek Ramaswamy is not legally eligible to be President. The natural born citizen clause predates the Fourteenth Amendment by several decades. He is a Fourteenth Amendment/Wong Kim Ark citizen, not a natural-born citizen. His campaign for the Presidency is illegitimate.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
She’s a liberal Neo Nazi
Trained and Brainwashed by her Leftist actor parents
Feted by the godless United Nations
It looks like ol’ Merv was creating his new account while simultaneously outing himself as a retread under the NotWokeOrCommie troll account.
Kind of takes FR trolling to a new level, as does the open support for Oblahblah.
Loretta Fuddy is unavailable to comment.
Such a multitasker that “Merv” is.
Yeah....the 0bie support was over the top.
Definitely overloaded, Diogenes. Mac is an emeritus professor and has moved into retirement digs. He mostly works on his Shakespeare scholarship these days. He was one of the editors of the complete works. A lot of academics work on linguistic analysis, but my experience with the programs that they use for analysis is that they’re amateurish, with poorly designed interfaces. Definitely graduate work for people looking for a degree in a hurry and then out into their fields.
I found the first professor I worked with, but Mac found me. For your purposes, it’s probably a matter of writing a brilliant query letter and searching out the current major scholars, explaining what the benefits are to them to work on this research. Finding my first academic partner was by looking for one of the top researchers and getting an introduction from him to another of the top researchers.
I should add, that the agreement with both professors was that I did all the grunt work and they did the analysis of what I provided. So it isn’t just a matter of getting someone else to do the work for you. For me, it was ten years of my life devoted to this work. You need to think about whether you want to make a major commitment.
The natural born citizen requirement was ignored in the 2008 and 2012 elections.
You missed 1881. The birther interpretation was ignored twice in 1881, with Republicans setting the precedent for ignoring birthers.
Thanks, I believe that is correct.
You clearly haven't seen the legwork done on Chester A. Arthur. Nobody knew his dad was foreign until 2008, and Arthur did everything he could to make sure nobody ever found out.
Not a good example. Arthur would not have tried to hide it if he thought it wouldn't matter.
“You missed 1881.”
Ah, yes. Chester Arthur, the possibly Canadian born president, spawn of an Irish father and possibly Canadian mother.
Judgment and Decision Making. Vol. Id. No. 6. November 21) 15. pp. 549-563On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit
Gordon Pennycook* James Allan Cheyne† Nathaniel Barr‡ Derek J. Koehler† Jonathan A. Fugelsang†
Abstract
Although bullshit is common in everyday life and has attracted attention from philosophers, its reception (critical or ingenuous) has not, to our knowledge, been subject to empirical investigation. Here we locus on pseudo-profound bullshit, which consists of seemingly impressive assertions that are presented as true and meaningful but are actually vacuous. We presented participants with bullshit statements consisting of buzzwords randomly organized into statements with syntactic structure but no discernible meaning (e.g., "Wholeness quiets infinite phenomena". Across multiple studies, the propensity to judge bullshit statements as profound was associated with a variety of conceptually relevant variables (e.g., intuitive cognitive style, supernatural belief. Parallel associations were less evident among profundity judgments for more conventionally profound (e.g.. "A wet person does not fear the rain") or mundane (e.g., "Newborn babies require constant attention") statements. These results support the idea that some people are more receptive to this type of bullshit and that detecting it is not merely a matter of indiscriminate skepticism but rather a discernment of deceptive vagueness in otherwise impressive sounding claims. Our results also suggest that a bias toward accepting statements as true may be an important component of pseudo-profound bullshit receptivity.
Wasn’t Trump’s mom born in Scotland?
They would be hated with a blue purple passion by all the liberals in the world, and especially those in Academia.
If they prove Madison wrote that, it means that the "father of the constitution" says the Vattel version of citizenship is the right one, and therefore Obama was ineligible and therefore not a real president.
Nobody in academia is going to touch that. It's like the third rail. :)
On the other hand, maybe one of them is a masochist?
I appreciate your information. I'm sorry I couldn't remember exactly how to spell your name.
I find I have that trouble a lot with a lot of freeper names.
No need to think. My commitment is to make sure my family lives well and prospers. I'm already committed to something that matters more to me than anything else.
Someone else will have to get the glory of identifying that bit of writing as coming from James Madison.
But the guy sure knows things that only the President, or someone very high in the administration would know about the situation of John McClure.
John McClure was denied US Citizenship and identified as a British Spy by John Armstrong, (Former General) the then American Ambassador to France.
There is a *LOT* more to the story, and it is quite interesting.
I would think that it was unlikely for anyone other than the president to know what was written in letters from Ambassador Armstrong. That's one of the reasons why it's pretty much got to be James Madison.
Who else would know these details?
Did you read "The Lucifer Principle"?
If you are doing it as a calculated effort, then go on ahead, though it won't make me stop. I don't get cowed by other people's opinions.
Oh, and did you ever find that letter from James Madison I asked you about? (Regarding the Common Law) Just because we argue doesn't mean that I don't still consider you a FRiend.
This crap is as stupid as it ever was. Ramaswamy was born in Ohio. He is a natural born citizen.
If King Charles were born in Ohio, would he be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States?
No. His mother would have been visiting Royalty. As a legal fiction, when a visiting royal, such as Queen Elizabeth, travels, her country travels with her and she is still considered to be on English territory. In any case, she would enjoy full immunity from our laws and 14A would not apply, just as it does not apply to accredited diplomats who enjoy similar immunity.
(He is a natural born citizen.)
No he’s not. He’s a statutory Citizen via the 14th Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.