Posted on 07/27/2023 1:23:56 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Trevor Sutcliffe @TrevorSutcliffe
Vivek Ramaswamy is not legally eligible to be President. The natural born citizen clause predates the Fourteenth Amendment by several decades. He is a Fourteenth Amendment/Wong Kim Ark citizen, not a natural-born citizen. His campaign for the Presidency is illegitimate.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
THE “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” Barry FINALLY came forth with has a few glaring errors:
The most glaring is the NAME OF THE HOSPITAL WHERE HE SUPPOSEDLY BORN in August 1961.
The name on the ‘certificate’ is the current name of the hospital——which is a MERGER of 2 other hospitals-—said MERGER happened 5-6 YEARS AFTER BARRY was born.
Then: Barry used the Social Security number originally issued to a man in CONNECTICUT born in 1896 for some years. THAT man got the number when SOCIAL SECURITY started in about 1936. BARRY NEVER LIVED OR WORKED IN CONNECTICUT—SO HE WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN issued a number from there.
ALSO-—WHEN Stanley Ann took Barry to INDONESIA-—SHE HAD to renounce/give up HIS American citizenship-—INDONESIA DOES NOT HAVE DUAL CITIZENSHIPS.
WHEN SHE SHIPPED HIM BACK TO GRANDMA to Honolulu at about age 10....THERE ARE NO RECORDS OF HER RE-APPLYING FOR BARRY’S USA CITIZENSHIP........
TOTALLY PHONY PRESIDENT
“https://majorityoftwo.blogspot.com/2009/08/barak-obama-is-canadian.html“
His mother “Stanley” was in Seattle for school. Went across the border to give birth in Canada. And of course I do not have proof. And I also cannot tell you the name of the CIA/Mafiosi/Cuban on the grassy knoll who shot JFK. They cover those things up well.
Didn’t we already cross that bridge in 2008?
BARACK PROVED ZERO
DEAN & PELOSI PUSHED THRU A FRAUD
Prove he wasn’t here.
IIRC-—BARACK even said in one of his books that he was born in KENYA.
Grandma OBAMA always said he was born in Mombassa, KENYA
(Guess what? An “anchor baby” is a US citizen.)
Guess what? The anchor baby is also a dual citizen and subject to his national parents birth country’s government. Therefore the anchor baby is not an Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen the founders envisioned to be president. Here’s a letter from the first justice of the Supreme Court, John Jay, to George Washington when framing the presidential clause.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/04-05-02-0251
Dear Sir
I was this morning honored with your Excellency’s Favor of the 22d Inst: & immediately delivered the Letter it enclosed to Commodore Jones, who being detained by Business, did not go in the french Packet, which sailed Yesterday.
Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.
Mrs Jay is obliged by your attention, and assures You of her perfect Esteem & Regard—with similar Sentiments the most cordial and sincere I remain Dear Sir Your faithful Friend & Servt
John Jay
Bite my ass moron. The Constitution cannot be undone. Words have meanings. There are millions who are eligible. Find one.
And citizenship is limited to “Free White persons of good character”, but here we are.
> I assure you that I am NOT lying nor fabricating this info. <
I never doubted your honesty ! Freepers have a wide range of (mainly) conservative opinions. Some I agree with, some I don’t. But I cannot recall a single case where I knew I was deliberately lied to. That says something pretty good about this site.
Anyway, my beef is not with you or with that booklet. My beef is with the Supreme Court for never having issued a clear opinion on the matter.
I don’t care if Vivek can score 165 on an IQ test. HE IS NOT NBC
lol.
Stop messing with Trumps best VP choice.
NO!
Endless yapping about the natural born citizen ...when the real issue is about the character of the man.
Do some research about how he became a billionaire at a young age and you would not vote for him if he was born on the Mayflower.
(a) Person born to foreign diplomat —
(1) Status of person. A person born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic officer accredited to the United States, as a matter of international law, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. That person is not a United States citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Such a person may be considered a lawful permanent resident at birth.
Being born here to two parents subject to a foreign jurisdiction makes you a foreigner.
BARAK was Kenyan citizen at birth-—ASK GRANDMA—SHE WAS THERE & SH BRAGGED ABOUT IT.
EXACTLY WHEN COMPARED TO HIS ACTUAL BIRTH DATE????
> Prove he wasn’t here. <
I’d think the Chinese-American kid would have to do the proving. He’d have to show by various documents (school records, utility bills, pay stubs, etc.) that yes, he did reside in the US for at least 14 years.
That’s the way it should work, anyway. But if the kid ran as a Democrat, no problem. The media, the GOPe, etc. would just take his word for it.
I have a superior memory.
I know the person who had the booklet, I saw the booklet, and later, when his child was born he happily said:"NOW MY SON CAN BECOME THE PRESIDENT, IF HE SO CHOOSES TO RUN!".
I am NOT lying, I did NOT make any of this up, but I do NOT know IF this has been changed or deleted from the booklets that are handed out to study, or even IF it is a question on the test today; however, this LAW was in effect for Obama, Haley, Harris, etc. when they were born.
But Obama is a DEM, so he skated.
Wanna bet IF the Dems will allow someone to "skate" IF they don't fall into being a REAL NBC, if one such ever gets the GOP nomination?
I described that difference earlier, and has been in the law since about 1804.
You point describing children of diplomats applies ONLY to children of diplomats.
See: Inglis v. Trustees of Sailor's Snug Harbor 28 US 99
That is, the party must be born within a place where the sovereign is at the time in full possession and exercise of his power, and the party must also at his birth derive protection from, and consequently owe obedience or allegiance to the sovereign as such, de facto. [Footnote 7] There are some exceptions which are founded upon peculiar reasons and which indeed illustrate and confirm the general doctrine. Thus, a person who is born on the ocean is a subject of the prince to whom his parents then owe allegiance, for he is still deemed under the protection of his sovereign and born in a place where he has dominion in common with all other sovereigns. So the children of an ambassador are held to be subjects of the prince whom he represents, although born under the actual protection and in the dominions of a foreign prince.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.