Wow, it almost doesn't even look like her. Stunning though indeed.
Posted on 07/26/2023 1:27:18 PM PDT by Twotone
Coutts bank, part of the NatWest Group, was exposed last week for having de-banked Nigel Farage for political reasons — something both the bank and the liberal British media previously denied.
Despite her apology last week, NatWest CEO Alison Rose has been ousted with the bank — her Tuesday admission to misleading the nation likely having been a factor.
While NatWest chairman Howard Davies indicated it "is a sad moment," Farage appears emboldened, stating on Twitter, "Dame Alison Rose has gone. Others must follow." What's the background?
Farage, the former English politician who proved instrumental in the 2020 restoration of British sovereignty via Brexit, revealed early this month that he had been de-banked by Coutts and told his funds would be shifted to the lender NatWest.
The Guardian and other left-leaning British publications parroted the bank's suggestion that the rationale behind the shuttering of Farage's account was due to financial issues, specifically his alleged failure to meet wealth criteria.
However, Farage told BBC Radio 4, "I have been with them for a decade and at the moment I have more money sitting on current account than I have had for most of that time."
The Brexiteer appeared convinced that "the establishment" was "trying to force [him] out of the UK" owing to his political views, reported the Financial Times.
He wasn't wrong.
TheBlaze indicated last week that Farage got his hands on documents revealing both that he was right on the money and that the Times, the BBC, the Guardian and other liberal outfits were dead wrong: Coutts had taken issue with his political viewpoints and past public opinions.
Contrary to the bank's earlier suggestion, the 40-page file from Coutts bank obtained via a "subject access request" contained an acknowledgement that Farage was a commercially-viable customer.
The document further highlighted apparently unbecoming remarks made by the former politician, stressing the bank would be best off closing his account and "exiting" him upon the expiry of his mortgage, even though "it is very likely that the client would 'go public.'"
Among Farage's remarks and stances that got under the bankers' skins were were:
his 2020 comparison of the destructive and scandal-prone Black Lives Matter movement to the Taliban over their shared iconoclastic tendency to tear down statues; his October 2022 suggestion that British politician Grant Shapps was a "remainer and a globalist"; his September 2022 suggestion that vicious tensions between Islamic and Hindu groups in Leicester were resultant of politicians deciding "to go down the road of diversity and multiculturalism"; his criticism of climate alarmism and his suggestion that "Net zero is net stupid"; his "Endorsements of Donald Trump"; and his appearances on InfoWars.
Farage called the document "abusive," likening it to a "Stasi-style surveillance report."
Suella Braverman, the British home secretary, responded the revelations, writing, "The Coutts scandal exposes the sinister nature of much of the Diversity, Equity & Inclusion industry."
After Coutts was exposed, NatWest CEO Alison Rose penned an apology to Farage, stating, "I believe very strongly that freedom of expression and access to banking are fundamental to our society and it is absolutely not our policy to exit a customer on the basis of legally held political and personal views. ... To this end, I would like to personally reiterate our offer to you of alternative banking arrangements at NatWest."
The BBC and its reporter Simon Jack, who now faces demands to resign, followed suit, apologizing Monday. Outs at Coutts
Sky News reported that Rose admitted to having been the BBC's source of the false suggestion that Farage's de-banking was executed on the basis of strictly commercial reasons.
Farage noted that this was a breach of client confidentiality and Financial Conduct Authority code.
"The first rule of banking is you have to obey client confidentiality. So they have made a complete and utter mess of this," said Farage.
Rose resigned and further confirmed she was no longer a member of the prime minister's business council on Wednesday.
The bank claimed Rose's departure was "by mutual consent," reported the Associated Press.
Following the news of Rose's resignation, shares in the bank dropped 4%.
Farage said online that he hopes "this serves as a warning to the banking industry. We need both cultural and legal changes to a system that has unfairly shut down many thousands of innocent people."
He said in a statement, "they should all go," referencing the whole of the NatWest board, including its chairman, Davies.
Farage vowed Wednesday evening in an article for the Telegraph that his "war on woke banks is about to rapidly expand."
"An emergency root and branch examination of what has happened at NatWest under Rose’s leadership must now take place. In recent years this bank – 39 per cent owned by taxpayers, remember – has morphed into a woke warrior," he wrote. "It has become obsessed with public displays of political correctness rather than focussing on the business of managing and making money. The truth is that in its quest to promote diversity and inclusion, this corporate giant has turned into a divisive and poisonous monster."
"Now is the time to fight back," wrote Farage, adding that he intends to be the voice for "everyday people" and "to campaign for the cultural and legal changes that our banking system needs."
The last time Farage put his mind to populist action, the United Kingdom ended up kicking the EU to the curb.
The Sunday Times recently indicated that NatWest is likely to soon face an avalanche of requests from tens-of-thousands of similarly de-banked customers, all wishing to know why they were canceled.
Banking minister Andrew Griffith convened a meeting of the executives from Britain's biggest banks Wednesday, telling them, "It’s not the job of banks to tell us what to think or what political party we should support."
"In a democracy that relies upon freedom of expression, freedom of thought, that isn’t a legitimate thing for a bank to remove someone’s access to a bank account, a really important building block of society today," added Griffith.
Like the fist of an angry God!
This crap happens when women run businesses. The CEO should be home barefoot and pregnant.
I am not a fan of banks being allowed to deplatform citizens. In fact, all banks should be open to all people; and only close accounts if the assets are proven to be criminally obtained.
I understand this is a private wealth institution that may have certain criteria. That is probably true here in the USA - I don’t think I could open a Goldman Sachs account for example. But they are not a traditional retail bank. I could go to Bank of America and have a Merrill Lynch account, and if I don’t meet the Merrill criteria they just put me into their retail division. But for banks to collude against certain classes of people based on politics or business interests is a very dangerous slope that should just be nipped in the bud via legislation.
Mercola reportedly had this done to them recently, by Chase, IIRC.
I hope that stupid summuvavitch has to beg for pence in front of his former bank to eat.
However,I refuse to believe that that is an un-retouched photo of a 58 year old woman.
The truth is that most British people are, overall, rather meh in appearance. And that applies to most young women.
The Spanish are much better looking as a population. And much less fat, a critical point.
Go to both and you will see.
It's the teeth.
Farage is the man. Good to see the leftist CEO get fired.
I saw that dollar goes far in Spain and Portugal.
This is all ESG BS. I’m glad Red State attorneys general are fighting it here in the US. I’m surprised anything was done about this in the UK.
Wow, it almost doesn't even look like her. Stunning though indeed.
Good work.I was just watching that episode on youtube.A truly great series.
Sadly, it will only those who are of a certain stature where there will be public outcry.
If it were you or me damn few would know or care enough to lift even mention it.
Bye, Banker Karen.
It may actually be easier to do this in the UK, because of the Parliamentary system. They have changed leaders several times and flopped back and forth between leading parties and coalitions. The powers that be over there in the UK may be a lot more concerned about “turnabout” e.g. that new leadership would turn the same policies against them, than our uniparty leaders seem to be concerned with here.
Plus, our system is designed to be slower. Theirs is fast. Our founders wanted a slow system to create stability but they got around that by creating a giant bureaucracy, mostly unaccountable to anyone, who can effect rapid change with the stroke of a pen or a policy update. They don’t need laws, or heck they don’t even need an official written policy just send some agency liaison to express concern about this that or the other and the private companies will oblige like Twitter, Facebook and banks too. This behavior needs to be reigned in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.