You said, “Well if you are saying I don’t give a sh*t what the High Priests of legaldom [aka SCOTUS]declare on the matter, than you are right, unless of course they happened to be members of the Constitutional convention or the Ratifying convention as John Marshall was.”
That is exactly what I told UltraSonic 007 - that this is not a legal issue for you, but instead a psychiatric disorder or delusion.
Sane people do not think like you do. Sane people can read the decision, and see what it means. Insane people will babble and drool all over the place.
I suggest you go get into therapy. Get Kerchner and Sharon Rondeau to go, too, and maybe you can all get a group discount rate!
Aka SCOTUS who was *NOT* at the constitutional convention or a member of the ratification delegates, then no, I don't care to get second hand opinions on the topic.
That is exactly what I told UltraSonic 007 - that this is not a legal issue for you, but instead a psychiatric disorder or delusion.
Yes, refusing to accept hearsay as being as good as a first hand account, is a psychiatric problem.
Later day Judges do not know what was the meaning, because *THEY* weren't there. They should listen to the people who were.
Sane people do not think like you do. Sane people can read the decision, and see what it means. Insane people will babble and drool all over the place.
Sane people just think whatever the courts tell them to think. If they say abortion is a right, "it's a RIGHT!" If they say homosexuals can marry! "Homosexual marriage is a RIGHT!" If they say "Men can become women." "Men are Women!"
Yeah, i'm the one who isn't sane. Thinking for yourself is a symptom of crazy. People should simply accept what people in robes tell them. Like a good little cult.