Aka SCOTUS who was *NOT* at the constitutional convention or a member of the ratification delegates, then no, I don't care to get second hand opinions on the topic.
That is exactly what I told UltraSonic 007 - that this is not a legal issue for you, but instead a psychiatric disorder or delusion.
Yes, refusing to accept hearsay as being as good as a first hand account, is a psychiatric problem.
Later day Judges do not know what was the meaning, because *THEY* weren't there. They should listen to the people who were.
Sane people do not think like you do. Sane people can read the decision, and see what it means. Insane people will babble and drool all over the place.
Sane people just think whatever the courts tell them to think. If they say abortion is a right, "it's a RIGHT!" If they say homosexuals can marry! "Homosexual marriage is a RIGHT!" If they say "Men can become women." "Men are Women!"
Yeah, i'm the one who isn't sane. Thinking for yourself is a symptom of crazy. People should simply accept what people in robes tell them. Like a good little cult.
You said, “Yeah, I’m the one who isn’t sane.”
Thank you for admitting it, finally!
(Oh, and don’t tell me that I am being deceptive, by cutting and snipping your comments. That is exactly what you Birthers do when you criticize Wong Kim Ark. You try to read one sentence out of context, and ignore the rest of the holding.)
You do this because you are mentally ill, and you can not admit that you are wrong. What did the psychiatrist above say?,
“When these individuals are not granted the rights they desire or are otherwise displeased with the outcome of legal proceedings, they become fixated on attaining justice. THIS FIXATION BEGINS A DOWNWARD SPIRAL THAT EVENTUALLY RESULTS IN A FULL-BLOWN DELUSIONAL DISORDER.”
FULL-BLOWN DELUSIONAL DISORDER! That is what you get when someone thinks Vattel trumps SCOTUS. FULL-BLOWN DELUSIONAL DISORDER.
Please go get therapy for this. You need it, and so do your buddies.